Unfinished Chile Observatory Makes Starry Discovery

An incomplete version of Chile's ALMA telescope array found that star formation was in full swing earlier than had been thought. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Billions of years ago the universe was a star-forming machine. Some galaxies were churning out a star every few hours. But today the Milky Way produces maybe a couple of stars annually. Now a study shows that the busy period of star formation was in full swing earlier than had been thought.

Researchers used an observatory still being built to examine dozens of so-called starburst galaxies billions of light-years away. The 66 linked dishes of the ALMA telescope array in Chile were inaugurated on March 13. But even a beta version with 16 dishes was able to peer deep into the history of the universe.

ALMA measured precise redshifts, or cosmic distances, to 18 of the starburst galaxies. Ten of those turned out to have redshifts greater than 4, meaning that the light from the galaxies took more than 12 billion years to reach us. The study is in the journal Nature. [Joaquin D. Vieira et al., Dusty starburst galaxies in the early Universe as revealed by gravitational lensing]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On average the starbursts were much farther away than similar, previously known objects. So the new study shows that vigorous bursts of star formation were already happening just a billion years after the Big Bang. Proving that our universe was a precocious youth.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe