New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Valley Boys Now Make Statements Sound Like Questions

Researchers say "valley speak," the tendency to end statements with a rising pitch, has been adopted by a new demographic: men. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Song audio: “So like I go into this like salon place, y'know/ And I wanted like to get my toenails done/ And the lady like goes, oh my god, your toenails/ Are like so grody]

I'm sure you're, like, totally familiar with "valley speak"—in which speakers end phrases with a rising pitch, so they sound like questions? The phenomenon's called "uptalk" and it's not just for valley girls. Linguists say guys now uptalk, too.

Researchers studied the speech of 12 female and 11 male native southern Californians. The volunteers had two tasks: to recount the plot of a TV episode, and to give directions. [Audio clip: "Start at the college.. keep going, towards the grocery store"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Overall, women used uptalk twice as often as men. Both sexes finished a sixth of their statements with a rising pitch. But women exclusively also used uptalk to signal they were still speaking—to hold the floor. The researchers presented their findings at a recent meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. [Amanda Ritchart and Amalia Arvaniti, Do We All Speak Like Valley Girls? Uptalk in Southern Californian English]

The results suggest uptalk has transcended its traditional demographic...valley girls...to catch on with men. But no word yet whether other elements of the vernacular have followed suit. [Valley Girl audio: “Barf out! Gross! Gag me!”]

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe