Wasted Food Equals Wasted Energy

Wasting food isn't just bad in its own right, it also represents a profound waste of energy. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We Americans waste over a quarter of all our food. That’s according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. I think of all the fruits and vegetables I buy that rot, or bread that gets moldy before I can eat it. And then there's all the food that gets tossed from restaurants and groceries.

It takes about 1.4 billion barrels of oil to grow, harvest, preserve, package and transport the U.S. food supply. So wasting food means wasting energy.

How much? A study published in this month's issue of the journal Environmental Science and Technology found out: roughly 350 million barrels of oil, or more than 2 quadrillion British thermal units of energy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Wasted milk, cheese and butter as well as that pesky produce rotting in refrigerators represent the biggest shares of the wasted energy. We also throw out as much as a third of all the fats and sugars we otherwise crave, which, I suppose, keeps the obesity epidemic from being even worse than it is.

Of course, figuring out how to stop all this food waste is a complex policy question and beyond the scope of this particular study. But the research reveals that less profligate agricultural production could save more energy than we’d gain by producing ethanol or even opening new areas to offshore drilling.

—David Biello

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe