Wearable Step Counters Offer Exercise Leg Up

High-tech pedometers do a decent job of counting steps accurately. Dina Fine Maron reports.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sometimes it’s hard to get moving. So setting a goal for the number of steps you walk each day can be a good motivator. But how to keep track of your total? A new study finds that many of the widely available wearable step counters actually keep a pretty accurate count. The research is in JAMA. [Meredith A. Case et al, Accuracy of Smartphone Applications and Wearable Devices for Tracking Physical Activity Data]

For the study, 14 volunteers agreed to walk on treadmills while decked out with 10 popular wearable or smartphone counting technologies. The devices were compared with actual manual counts of either 500 or 1,500 steps. So how’d they do? 

Smartphone apps were better step trackers than wearable tech—but the wearables were not terrible either. They typically slightly undercounted, compared to manual tallies, for example.  Some of the discrepancy between the apps and wearables could be because volunteers’ phones were in a pocket close to their hips where it may be easier to pick up specific movements. But in everyday life smartphones would not always be in a pocket, of course.

Of the 10 apps or devices studied, the Fitbit One was most accurate and had good consistency. 

Although none of the counts were that far off—for example, clocking just 1,200 steps instead of 1,500—the findings suggest that it’s probably a good idea to take the numbers as a loose estimate. And if you can’t walk somewhere, you can still feel motivated to park a few hundred steps away from your final destination.

—Dina Fine Maron 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe