Whale Predecessors Had 100-Million-Year Run

A study in the journal Science shows that bony fish filter-feeders spent 100 million years developing and occupying the niche that baleen whales do now. Another Science study finds that whale diversity has been determined by the types of tiny organisms they eat. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes scientific discoveries are hidden in museum specimen drawers and old journal articles. In two studies in the journal Science, researchers who went through the stuff in institutional attics offer new insights into the development and diversity of filter-feeding whales—and the fish that first occupied that ecological niche.

It had been thought that mammoth, filter-feeding fish—which swam through the water with a gaping, open mouth, collecting tiny marine creatures—only lived fleetingly before whales took their place in the food chain.

But a research team [led by Matt Friedman, University of Oxford] decided to take a closer look at museum fossils of bony, pre-historic fish that had either been misclassified or ignored. They also reexamined previous studies.The investigators now say that these fish filter-feeders lived from about 170 to 65 million years ago, a healthy stretch in which to pioneer and perfect the niche. [See http://bit.ly/9MVd4Y]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a related study, scientists [Felix Marx, University of Otago, New Zealand and Mark Uhen, George Mason University] show that when filter-feeding whales took over from bony fish, their diversity was linked to the diversity of their dinner—the tiny creatures at the very bottom of the food chain –tiny algae known as diatoms. [See http://bit.ly/cekTKZ]

New insights into some of the largest—and smallest—creatures on the planet.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe