White Views on Academic Merit Change with Competition

Whites thought grade point average as a college admission requirement was more important when in competition with African-Americans than with Asian-Americans. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

How much do you think Grade Point Average should factor into university admission decisions? Depends on race, actually. At least that's what one survey suggests.

The University of California Survey Research Center randomly dialed nearly 600 white adults within the state. They asked half the respondents how important GPA should be in determining admissions to the UC system. They asked the other half the same question, but prefaced it with the fact that Asians make up nearly 40 percent of the UC student body—three times their share of the state's population.

Turns out the white group aware of the population Asian placed less importance on GPA—presumably, says sociologist Frank Samson, because they felt that that particular measure of merit was benefiting Asian students and not them. Samson presented the findings at a recent meeting of the American Sociological Association in New York. [Frank L. Samson, Multiple Group Threat and Malleable White Attitudes Towards Academic Merit, in Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There's one twist: when respondents were asked to consider competition by blacks as well as Asians, they went back to upping the importance of GPA, possibly to exclude black students they presumed would score lower. All of which suggests our opinions about academic merit may be more biased than we'd like to admit.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe