New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why One Researcher Marched for Science

Lisa Klein, from the materials science and engineering department at Rutgers University, commented on the March for Science at an April 21 talk to the chemistry department at Lehman College in the Bronx.

 

Lehman College, CUNY

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“And tomorrow I’ll be marching, because don’t you think Millie would agree with the March for Science.”

Lisa Klein, from the materials science and engineering department at Rutgers University in New Jersey. On Friday evening, April 21st, she gave a talk to the chemistry department at Lehman College in the Bronx. She was filling in for the scheduled speaker, her friend Millie Dresselhaus, who sadly died in February at the age of 86. Dresselhaus, who was raised in the Bronx, was the recipient of the National Medal of Science and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

“On Earth Day we need to take care of our planet, remind others it’s the only one we have. And the March for Science in New Jersey is in Trenton. The emblem for the march in D.C. is Science, Not Silence because science means fact-based policies, free inquiry, strong public education.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


She also told a story about an incident that might have helped motivate her decision to march for science. She mentions STEM, which stands for science, technology, engineering and match, usually in an educational context.

“On March 28th, Education Secretary DeVos and the president’s daughter were filmed taking a group of young women to the National Air and Space Museum, where the president’s daughter said that the boys should empower the girls to stay in STEM, and I ask do we really need the boys’ permission? And shortly after that the budget was delivered to Congress where the president removed NASA’s Office of Education, which works to promote STEM for girls along with other educational initiatives. Let’s move on.” [laughter]

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe