New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Will the Oil Spill Kill Sperm Whales?

A group of endangered sperm whales live in the vicinity of the oil spill--and now one of them has turned up dead. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The NOAA ship Pisces discovered a

dead sperm whale on June 15—a possible victim of the ongoing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  

There are at least


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


1,600 such sperm whales in the Gulf, according to marine biologist Thomas Shirley of Texas A&M University. Minus one.  

The irony is that sperm whales can thank oil for their species's survival. Kerosene refined from such petroleum helped displace the

whale oil that lit lamps in the 19th century and led to the near extinction of many whale species.  

Saving the whales has proven a benefit to the marine environment, including helping storage of the greenhouse gases produced by burning oil that are changing the global climate.

Sperm whale poop helps fertilize algae, which in turn suck up carbon dioxide via photosynthesis.  

Samples from the

dead whale (pdf) will ultimately tell what killed this denizen of the deep. Those won't be handed off for testing until July 2 when the Pisces returns to port. And the tests take weeks.  

Regardless, it is known that such sperm whales feed on deepwater squid that may be impacted by plumes of

dispersed oil . The endangered whales have also been spotted surfacing into the slick. How the millions of liters of oil will impact sperm whales and other cetaceans is an ongoing, unintentional science experiment. 

—David Biello

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe