Wolverine No Match for Climate Change

The doughty predator is dwindling, thanks seemingly to less snow as a result of global warming. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Forget polar bears or penguins. The charismatic megafauna suffering most from climate change may well be the wolverine—a vicious predator known for its uncanny strength and tenacity. Making it the perfect inspiration for the X-Men superhero.  The actual wolverine's super powers extend mostly to a tolerance for Arctic chill and supersized feet to permit quicker movement on snow. Those big feet might be hurting the largest member of the weasel family as snowpack declines across much of North America.  Wildlife biologists report in the journal Population Ecology that fur trappers have caught fewer and fewer wolverines over the last decades of the 20th century. That coincides with snowpack declining across Canada everywhere except the Yukon. Unfortunately for the wolverine, which is already endangered, action to combat the climate change behind this has been slow. The government of the Great White North has most recently repudiated its previous commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol in favor of a slight rise as part of signing up to the Copenhagen Accord. While 55 countries did commit to action via that accord, their commitments fall well shy of what's needed to slow or even reverse global warming.  That probably means less snow for the wolverine, which may mean less food and fewer chances to disperse to new homes. As a result, the mighty wolverine appears to be among the first confirmed victims of a changing climate.—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe