Wolves Unwittingly Help Yogi and Booboo

The reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone National Park had an unanticipated, positive effect on the bear population by making more berries available. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Wolves and bears sound like unlikely allies. But the resurgence of Yellowstone Park's canine population has helped the bears. In a berry interesting way.

In the 1990s, people reintroduced wolves to Yellowstone Park, where they had been absent for most of the century. As their population grew, they began hunting elk, reducing their number. And with fewer elk snacking on berries, more fruit remained available for bears.

Comparisons of grizzly scat collected in the years before and after the wolves’ return showed an increase in the bears’ berry consumption, particularly during the months of July and August. The study is in the Journal of Animal Ecology. [William J. Ripple et al., Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Fruit can make up fully half of a grizzly’s diet as it prepares for hibernation. But bears and berries aren’t the only ones to benefit from wolves. The canine comeback also boosted the growth of popular elk foods such as aspen and willow trees. Which proves even a single species can have a beary strong ecosystem effect.

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe