Zebra Coloration Messes With Fly Eyes

Horseflies misjudge landings on zebra patterns, compared with solid gray or black surfaces, which provides evidence for why evolution came up with the black-and-white pattern.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Everyone loves zebras. No doubt it’s the natty stripes, no doubt. But recent research into why the stripes exist indicates that the markings may be something of a mixed blessing for the zebras that wear them.

New research adds to evidence against old ideas that somehow stripes cool them down or confuse predators, such as lions—confusing lions would be nice for them. But the good news is that a group of researchers have additional evidence in support of a hypothesis they proposed in 2014: stripes seem to confuse biting flies, causing cause them to overfly or crash into the zebras. The study is in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [Martin J. How et al, Zebra stripes, tabanid biting flies and the aperture effect]

Various ideas have been tossed around in the last 150 years about the African equids’ stripes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This debate goes right back to the birth of evolution, with Darwin and Wallace exchanging letters on the subject.”

Martin How, a biologist who studies animal vision at the University of Bristol, and lead author of the study.

How and his colleagues sought a mechanism for how stripes cause insect confusion. They began with domestic horses in Great Britain. They covered the horses with rugs featuring an array of designs: from single-color black or grey to checked patterns and, of course, zebra stripes. The researchers then recorded videos of horseflies trying to get at the horses.

“When we looked in detail at what these zebra stripes were doing to horseflies as they were flying, coming in to land, we found that horseflies were flying much faster as they came to land on striped patterns than they were when they were landing on grey or black.”

Faster and more erratically. The flies made successful landings much less frequently on the horses in stripes than on the solids. But there’s more:

“And interestingly, we also in our recent work found that this also applies to checked patterns. So it seems there’s something about black and white patterns that’s really confusing these flies.”

One assumption was that stripes affect the flies’ optic flow via a process known as the aperture effect.  That effect creates a visual illusion akin to a barbershop’s pole, inducing distortion and causing flies to misjudge landings upon striped surfaces.

But crediting the aperture effect’s ability to discombobulate biting flies appears to be flawed—because the researchers found that checked surfaces were just as effective at repelling flies as were stripes.

“Once we’d lost the aperture effect as a possible explanation for how zebra stripes affect fly behaviour, we then had to turn to other suggestions. So there might be some other kind of illusion that is happening in the eyes of these flies. And it could also be that the stripes are disrupting the search pattern that these flies need to try and find a host. So we’re undertaking more experiments now to try and find out which of those is the case.”

Whatever the result, evolution had a good reason to make zebras a horse of a different color.

—Mark Stratton

(The above text is a transcript of this podcast)   

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe