Scientific American Presents a Beetle Curator

Max Barclay curates insects at London's Museum of Natural History. He discovered the only known beetles collected by the famed 19th century explorer, Dr. David Livingstone, in a dusty old box.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientific American editor-in-chief Mariette DiChristina interviewed Max Barclay in the collections room at the Museum of Natural History in London. What Barclay said is below.

We’re here in The Natural History Museum in the beetles section.

Now this is a collection made by a lawyer called E. Y. Western who died in 1924, and he died leaving a collection—a private collection—of some 10[,000] or 12,000 beetles.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Over the ensuing 70 or 80 years most of that material has been worked up. But there are a few boxes left that nobody got around to. These boxes were considered to be of limited importance because they contained fairly common species with relatively poor information associated with them.

But I was just browsing through this collection not very long ago, and I came across some specimens—I’ve taken them out now—that were collected by Dr. David Livingstone on the second Zambezi expedition in the 1860s. Those are the only beetle specimens that we know of that were collected by Livingstone on that expedition.

It seems that they were sold by auction sometime in the 1860s–1870s, when Livingstone was still in Africa, by somebody else who was on the expedition. They were bought by this private individual, so nobody knew that they were there.

They were looked over by the scientists at the time, and they were judged to be common species, and nobody looked in detail at the labels that were written underneath to see that they were collected by this famous explorer.

Now, in the main collection here we have, as I said, about 260 or 270,000 species represented of beetles. That’s about 60 percent of the known beetles in the world. I’ve got an example of a drawer from the main collection. I’m gonna take the glass off that.

This has been re-curated so that each species is in its own separate, little tray. Now with 22,000 drawers, it takes about two and a half hours to re-curate one drawer, so you can work out how much time is actually required to bring the standard up.

The great natural history collections themselves, they’re one of the last great frontiers of exploration. These exist not only as an archive of biodiversity, but they’re an archive of historical and cultural information as well.

[The above text is a transcript of this video.]

Credits:

Producer: Eliene Augenbraun

Interviewer/Videographer: Mariette DiChristina

Special thanks to:

  • The Museum of Natural History, London

Eliene Augenbraun is a multimedia science producer, formerly Nature Research's Multimedia Managing Editor and Scientific American's senior video producer. Before that, she founded and ran ScienCentral, an award-winning news service providing ABC and NBC with science news stories. She has a PhD in Biology.

More by Eliene Augenbraun

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe