To mitigate the impacts of such bottom trawling, Puig suggests that marine-protected areas could be established to prevent the extension of the fishing technique into as yet undisturbed regions. Such marine-protected areas, Puig says, could "play the same role that natural parks play in emerged land."

14 Comments

1. 1. rollership 07:07 PM 9/5/12

   Do we have to destroy the final frontier before we even see this magical alien world at the bottom of the ocean? yeah lets just destroy the view for future ocean tourists to ocean cities and kill everything in the ocean, sounds like us.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. Unksoldr 07:27 PM 9/5/12

   Why this is news I have no idea. Common sense would tell you that this is exactly what bottom trawling would do.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. T1Brit 08:45 AM 9/6/12

   You know what I think? This is spin. It is a Spanish study - the Spanish trawler fleet is the greatest single force for destruction of the deep Ocean in the world. They need some good press badly. So they commission this stupid study which concludes the bleeding obvious, and also adds a slightly rosy image of the seafloor looking like ploughed meadows. The Spanish scientist says 'basically they are doing the same thing as farmers did in Europe' Oh really? I understood that it is more like raping the seafloor and leaving it devastated and barren - not adding anything, not growing any crops - just wiping out every damned living thing like a bombing run. Those scientists are PR men for the Spanish trawler fleet.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. dbiello in reply to Unksoldr 09:39 AM 9/6/12

   True, but this is the first empirical proof. And the scale and regularity were somewhat unexpected.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

5. 5. kienhua68 07:32 PM 9/6/12

   I can say that bottom trawling, above all other possible
   insults to the sea, has the longest lasting negative effect on the ocean environment and our food supply.
   
   'Farming' the ocean has never been a concept, fishermen or the fishing industry could accept. Living on Cape Cod I watched as the Draggers scraped away the future of fishing on the Cape. That along with no concern for
   how many fish were taken per trip.
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

6. 6. Postman1 11:07 PM 9/6/12

   I wonder if bottom trawling could stir up nutrients from the sediment and add to the food supply for krill and other bottom-of-the-food-chain creatures? If so, it wouldn't be an all bad situation.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

7. 7. spinylumpsucker 03:42 PM 9/7/12

   It isn't news that trawling is destructive - to ocean biodiversity, fish habitats, etc. I guess the news here is that it's also fundamentally reconstructing the topography of our ocean floor. There's very little video footage of trawlers in action, but there is this one, which is pretty horrifying:
   
   http://youtu.be/cVHRsRQ-UIo

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

8. 8. Deweye 04:05 PM 9/8/12

   Almost as horryfying in all this is that, still, our human perception and awearness are so focused on our own, imagined,land-based biosphere, when we out to realize that there is really just one integreated biosphere; dramatic changes in one part of it will ultimately have consequences on the other parts. Where is the united human effort to stop bottom trawling?

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

9. 9. Quinn the Eskimo 01:31 AM 9/9/12

   I didn't realize, David, that the sea mounts had been so eroded by fishing. The distinguished Bob Ballard had declared the sea floor large mud flats. Perhaps, with all this damage, we should ban the restaurants that are called Red Lobster from offering sea food?

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

10. 10. Ian St. John 01:19 PM 9/10/12

    I agree with the article in terms of making some areas off limits to fishing, but it should be selected 'nursery habitat' mostly and it should encompass a large proportion of the total fishable seabed. 60 to 80% in my opinion. Couple this with elimination of species and catch quotas in the open areas so that the 'restricted' areas provide the nursery for generations of fish, while the open areas provide the catch without dumping of 'bycatch' so that we can utilise almost all of the fish we catch. The 'regulation' of fisheries would be 'automatic' as fish move from the regulated to the unregulated areas (from population pressure) ensuring a good population of mature fish to maintain spawning. Also, the size of the fish would go down a bit (the largest fish are the best spawners) which would help to ensure a stable and efficient production of new spawn. Taking the largest fish ONLY is counter productive.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

11. 11. HubertB 08:04 PM 9/10/12

    The most productive fish nursery is a mangrove swamp. An extremely large of the world's mangroves have been cut down (Miami Beach). The second most productive fish nursery is a salt marsh. Many of those are now sports arenas (meadowlands), airports (JFK), houses, warehouses. etc. We are probably allowing trawlers to destroy another great fish nursery. We are eating our seed corn.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

12. 12. IslandGardener 03:44 AM 9/11/12

    'Fishermen are not doing anything different than farmers many decades ago... Fishing grounds could be seen as farm fields' says Pere Puig.
    
    This sounds horribly like the argument used by biologist Thomas Huxley (who should have known better) in the 19th century when deciding whether to do anything about trawling. He ignored the protests of non-trawling fishermen.
    
    I learnt this recently by reading the excellent 'The Unnatural History of the Sea' by marine biologist Callum Roberts. It's a heartbreaking read, because the destruction he describes is so terrible, and has been going on so long, that we can barely even imagine the riches we have destroyed.
    
    But he ends more positively, with evidence that marine conservation (including banning trawling from almost everywhere) can restore much of that richness.
    
    http://www.york.ac.uk/res/unnatural-history-of-the-sea/
    
    And anyway farm fields are not such a great example of being environmentally friendly. We've destroyed natural habitats and turned the carbon in soil organic matter into carbon dioxide.
    
    If we want to see how we could get food from the sea in ethical and sustainable ways with a good land analogy it'd be better to think of something like forest gardening and other forms of agroforestry.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agroforestry
    Then we'd be more likely to think it was stupid to reduce the structural diversity of the seafloor and to destroy all the habitats which used to be there. If there's no habitat for fish fry to live in or feed from when they're at their smallest and most vulnerable then how can they grow to be the fish which we then want to catch?
    
    I wonder what the Marine Stewardship Council make of all this...
    http://www.msc.org/

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

13. 13. lennysupak@live.com in reply to rollership 09:49 PM 9/12/12

    Been there done "that". It may be too far gone already. If you would like a tour of the Bering Sea go ahead. While you can. It is a rather unforgiving and fascinating area. It would be
    "nice" to save something, beautiful. In USA inc. I agree.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

14. 14. BuckSkinMan 11:40 PM 9/12/12

    Keeping humans from food - especially from the more delectable kinds - seems to be a rather overly optimistic endeavor. ;-)
    
    While this article deals only with a limited example (reminding one of the oh-so simple minded use of desert island metaphores), it fails to address what is being done to improve the methods like bottom trawling. Like we've never seen prior examples: nets which release turtles and other protected species, etc.
    
    Dragging out the crayons and construction paper, lets draw a diagram for those who find this idea challenging. 1. examine a technological method which produces successful harvests. 2. look for and study any deleterious side effects. 3. come up with new designs to continue the successful harvesting while eliminating damage to the environment. Rinse and repeat.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this