A Digital Obsession

How to feel less stressed and more empowered and to create a life of meaning—without your phone

Scientific American MIND, May-June 2021

Scientific American MIND, May-June 2021

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Before the pandemic grounded most of us, if you’d ever ridden the subway or a bus, flew on a commercial flight or, heck, been anywhere in public with lots of other people, chances are you’d have seen a familiar thing: all heads around you bowed, eyes locked intently on a cell-phone screen. If people had near constant phone fixation in the prepandemic times, it might be safe to call it a flat-out phone addiction in the age of rolling lockdowns and perpetual social distancing; one survey found that average U.S. adult smartphone time surpassed three hours a day for the first time ever in 2020. A lot of this screen time is likely mindless scrolling from one post to another—in one way, it’s a distraction from thinking about the strife in one’s own life and in the world. As writer Karen K. Ho tells our technology editor Sophie Bushwick in this issue’s cover story, this so-called doomscrolling robs “future-you of the energy you need to really focus on important things and also to take better care of yourself” (see “Stop Doomscrolling News and Social Media”).

Scrolling further into this issue, senior editor Gary Stix has a fascinating conversation with Vanderbilt University professor of psychology Steven D. Hollon about the role of therapy in treating depression (see “Evolution Could Explain Why Psychotherapy May Work for Depression”). And journalist Christiane Gelitz explores the debate over whether you can read a lie on someone’s face (see “Humans Are Pretty Lousy Lie Detectors”). Once you’ve finished this absorbing collection, I recommend stepping away from your screen and getting some fresh spring air.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 32 Issue 3This article was published with the title “A Digital Obsession” in SA Mind Vol. 32 No. 3 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0521-2

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe