New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A Digital Obsession

How to feel less stressed and more empowered and to create a life of meaning—without your phone

Scientific American MIND, May-June 2021

Scientific American MIND, May-June 2021

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Before the pandemic grounded most of us, if you’d ever ridden the subway or a bus, flew on a commercial flight or, heck, been anywhere in public with lots of other people, chances are you’d have seen a familiar thing: all heads around you bowed, eyes locked intently on a cell-phone screen. If people had near constant phone fixation in the prepandemic times, it might be safe to call it a flat-out phone addiction in the age of rolling lockdowns and perpetual social distancing; one survey found that average U.S. adult smartphone time surpassed three hours a day for the first time ever in 2020. A lot of this screen time is likely mindless scrolling from one post to another—in one way, it’s a distraction from thinking about the strife in one’s own life and in the world. As writer Karen K. Ho tells our technology editor Sophie Bushwick in this issue’s cover story, this so-called doomscrolling robs “future-you of the energy you need to really focus on important things and also to take better care of yourself” (see “Stop Doomscrolling News and Social Media”).

Scrolling further into this issue, senior editor Gary Stix has a fascinating conversation with Vanderbilt University professor of psychology Steven D. Hollon about the role of therapy in treating depression (see “Evolution Could Explain Why Psychotherapy May Work for Depression”). And journalist Christiane Gelitz explores the debate over whether you can read a lie on someone’s face (see “Humans Are Pretty Lousy Lie Detectors”). Once you’ve finished this absorbing collection, I recommend stepping away from your screen and getting some fresh spring air.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 32 Issue 3This article was published with the title “A Digital Obsession” in SA Mind Vol. 32 No. 3 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0521-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe