Transparent Rats, Rotting Pigs, a Smart Sock and More in Scientific American’s October Issue

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists in California have turned a dead rat clear, rendering it the world’s first transparent mammal. Julia Calderone explains the procedure in Scientific American’s October Advances, which scientists say could also be applied to humans, opening up a world of possibility for biologists—and crime show producers.

Those producers should stay tuned, too, because forensic scientists are studying how soil microbes react to a dead body that is left outside to rot. Three dead pigs dutifully participated in an experiment to this end, and Jennifer Frazer explores how amoebas caught underneath the corpses could help investigators identify when a body hit the ground.

A cheap new reality is emerging for gamers and therapists alike with the debut of the Facebook-owned Oculus Rift virtual-reality headset. The technology won’t hit stores until 2015 but Corinne Iozzio reports that scientists are already testing virtual reality’s ability to combat heroin addiction, social anxiety and PTSD.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

If you dumped a heavy bucket of cold water over your head this summer for charity, you may have wondered, “What is the point of this, exactly?” Tara Haelle reports on new research on neurodegenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)—the disease at the center of the Ice Bucket Challenge campaign—along with Huntington's and Alzheimer's diseases. Scientists have shown the proteins that cause these disorders move from cell to cell—a discovery may lead to future treatments.

Also in October’s Advances section:

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American