Algorithms Read Your Intentions by Tracking Your Eyes

Software that translates eye movement into commands to control devices could be a boon for motion-impaired people

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Earlier this year when Erik Sorto, a quadriplegic man, used his thoughts to direct a robot arm to bring a beer to his lips, the media went wild. It was an impressive feat. The catch is that the technology behind it—an electrode-laden chip implanted in Sorto's brain—is expensive and invasive and often requires months of training. Worse, few paralyzed people have the psychological and physical profile the technology requires.

There could be a better way. Rather than creating a direct link between the brain's electrical activity and machines, Aldo Faisal, an associate professor of neurotechnology at Imperial College London, wants to use eye movements to control wheelchairs, computers and video games. With off-the-shelf video-game cameras, Faisal and his colleagues built goggles that record the user's eye movements and feed those data to a computer. Software then translates the data into machine commands. Almost anyone can use the technology, including amputees, quadriplegics and those suffering from Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis or muscular dystrophy. The system costs less than $50 to build. At a science exhibition, the vast majority of thousands of volunteers grasped the technology well enough after 15 seconds to play the game Pong, no instructions needed.

Scientists have long known that the eyes can reveal people's objectives—where they want to go, what they want to do, who they want to interact with. Drawing on 70 years of research into the neuroscience of eye movements, Faisal and his colleagues wrote algorithms that turn a glance into a command for a wheelchair, a wink into a mouse click or the dart of a pupil into the swing of a game paddle. To predict intention, the algorithms depend on training from real-world data, acquired by recording volunteers' eyes as they drove a wheelchair with a joystick or operated a robotic arm. Gradually the software learned to tell the difference between, for example, the way people look at a cup when they are evaluating its contents and when they want to pick it up and take a drink.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Before Faisal can commercialize any medical devices based on the invention, he must secure funding for clinical trials. In the meantime, a €4-million grant from the European Union will support his group as it develops robotic exoskeletons that paralyzed people could control using the eye-tracking software it developed. “I want to see what I can do to help people move again,” Faisal says. “That's my focus.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe