New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Allergen-Free Trees

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Imagine walking down a tree-lined street, on a glorious afternoon in the middle of spring. The male trees on the block are puffing out pollen, and you're suffering as your tear ducts and nasal passages react to the allergens that assault your body.

It doesn¿t have to be like that, suggests Steve Strauss, a professor of forest genetics and biotechnology at Oregon State University. In the future, city tree departments might purchase genetically modified (GM) trees that never produce pollen or fruiting bodies, just leaves. Instead, they would redirect the energy normally expended on reproduction to grow more quickly.

Genetically engineered "male-sterile" shade trees, Strauss says, "would reduce health impacts in the Southwest, in Southern California in particular (which has an especially large percentage of allergy sufferers) and not change any other characteristics of the trees.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But creating non-allergenic trees, Strauss says, will be possible only "once the technology is reliable," which may take as much as a decade or more. So far it's been difficult to get the right genes in the right places to create the desired effects. In his lab, Strauss says, "the crux of the scientific work is determining what makes trees flower at a certain time," so that flowering can be controlled or the genes cut out altogether. Energy once spent on flowering might then be focused on growth.

Non-flowering plants could also ensure the containment of genes for herbicide resistance (or other traits conferred to the organisms), counteracting the concern that transgenic trees would spread their lab-produced genetics throughout nearby wild forest. "We move trees around the landscape, out of their native range, sometimes pretty significantly," Strauss says. "This could be a tool to keep those highly bred genes from polluting the wild type."

Though it is hard to imagine a spring without allergies.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe