New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Archeologists Just Found a 2,000-Year-Old Battle Trumpet That May Be Linked to Queen Boudica

This newly discovered Iron Age instrument may have been played in the Celtic resistance against the Roman Empire

A carnyx or battle horn dating to Iron Age.

© Norfolk Museums Service

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It was supposed to be a routine excavation. But archaeologists who were called in last year to inspect a site before construction began at a residential property in West Norfolk, England, made a truly remarkable discovery: an approximately 2,000-year-old battle trumpet.

The Iron Age instrument, known as a carnyx, might once have been used by Celtic tribes in their war against the encroaching Roman Empire—and perhaps even by the forces of the warrior queen Boudica.

Boudica led the Iceni tribe that once occupied parts of present-day Norfolk and is most famous for leading an ultimately unsuccessful battle against the Romans around C.E. 60 or 61. The archaeologists place the trumpet’s age at around the same time as the queen.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The carnyx is one of only three of its kind from Britain and is “one of the most complete found in Europe,” according to a statement from Historic England. It was found alongside a collection of other metal objects, including five shield bosses and a bronze boar’s head that was likely used as a military standard.

Excavated boar standard.

Excavated boar standard.

© Norfolk Museums Service

“I’ve been doing archaeology for over 40 years, and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Mark Hinman, CEO of Pre-Construct Archaeology, which originally found the objects, to the Guardian. He described the discovery as “a once-in-a-lifetime” find.

“We are absolutely within the heartland of the Iceni—whether it was they who buried the hoard or not, we just don’t know,” Hinman said. Still, the artifacts are “of such quality” that “any important people from the Iceni and other groups would have known these objects.”

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe