New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Are Lefties Physically or Psychologically More Vulnerable?

Stephen Christman, a professor of psychology at the University of Toledo, explains

For illustration purposes only.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For much of its history, the field of neuropsychology strived to understand what was wrong with the human species' left-handed minority. This effort was eventually abandoned after two key insights emerged. First, experts realized that handedness has a genetic basis, and any attempts to change it can have deleterious developmental consequences. Second, we learned that left-handers have remained a stable 10 to 15 percent of the human population for thousands of years: if lefties were truly weaker in some way, their numbers would have dwindled over time.

Still, people continue to question whether lefties are more vulnerable to physical and psychological maladies, despite only shaky evidence to support such claims. A well-publicized study in the early 1990s, for instance, reported that lefties had shorter life spans than righties, but those results have since been discredited. Subsequent research found no meaningful differences in mortality rates.

Likewise, very little evidence indicates that lefties are more likely to develop physical ailments. Some highly speculative research suggests that left-handers may be at a greater risk for restless legs syndrome and asthma, but other investigations report that left-handers face a lower risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. Some researchers have proposed a tenuous association between handedness and the risk of schizophrenia as well as creative thinking. Studies suggest that significantly fewer people who consistently use their right hand develop schizophrenia, compared with left- or inconsistent-handers, who use their nondominant hand for common activities. But this observation lacks a causal explanation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because most equipment is built for right-handers, it is possible that left-handers are more prone to physical injuries at work or accidents while driving. Studies also show, though, that left-handed professional athletes may have an advantage over their right-handed peers because their movements are less predictable. In summary, handedness may influence certain behaviors or risks for specific disorders, but the evidence to date does not definitively support or convincingly account for these links.

Question submitted by Kevin McElroy via e-mail

Do you have a question about the brain you would like an expert to answer? Send it to MindEditors@sciam.com

SA Mind Vol 27 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Are lefties physically or psychologically vulnerable?” in SA Mind Vol. 27 No. 6 (), p. 73
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1116-73

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe