New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Astronomers Indirectly Spot Neutrinos Released Just 1 Second after the Birth of the Universe

The cosmic neutrino background could provide more details about the universe as it once was

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The universe's oldest light hasn't made a pit stop for 13.82 billion years—beginning its journey just 380,000 years after the big bang. That light, the so-called cosmic microwave background (CMB), serves as a familiar hunting ground for astronomers who seek to understand the universe in its infancy. Unfortunately, it also obscures what lies beyond it: the first hundreds of thousands of years of the universe. Now astronomers think they have peeked beyond even the CMB by capturing evidence of neutrinos traveling since the cosmos was just a second old.

Neutrinos, fundamental particles with no electric charge and very little mass, escaped from the big bang nearly immediately. Their elusive nature allows them to slip through almost all physical barriers, rarely interacting with normal matter. On the rare occasions that they bump into photons, however, they alter the particles' temperatures ever so slightly. It was this temperature shift that astronomers from the University of California, Davis, recently noticed in maps of the CMB produced by the European Space Agency's Planck satellite. They describe this “cosmic neutrino background” in a recent paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Models of the big bang predicted the cosmic neutrino background decades ago, but this indirect observation is the most robust yet. The discovery “gives us a new window on the universe,” says Lawrence M. Krauss, co-director of the Cosmology Initiative at Arizona State University, who was not involved with the study. The detection also constrains properties of neutrinos, which are by far the strangest beasts in the particle zoo. For example, it proves that neutrinos cannot interact with themselves, like many other particles do. If they could, they would leave different signatures within the CMB than those observed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Further detections of these primordial neutrinos may explain why there are far more particles of matter in the universe than antimatter particles.* The asymmetry was produced in the early universe, and experts think neutrinos had something to do with it, if only because they are so mysterious. “Because we know less about neutrinos, you can be more creative with the kinds of physics you introduce,” the study's co-author Lloyd Knox says. Although these particles are incredibly difficult to detect directly, Knox anticipates that hints from cosmological observations will help solve many neutrino puzzles—and therefore provide a more revealing peek of the universe as it once was.

Editor's Note (1/26/16): This sentence from the print article was edited after it was posted online. The original misstated the universe's matter–antimatter ratio. 

Shannon Hall is an award-winning freelance science journalist based in the Rocky Mountains. She specializes in writing about astronomy, geology and the environment.

More by Shannon Hall
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 6This article was published with the title “The Big Bang's Particle Glow” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 6 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1215-25

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe