Bang and Splat

A supercomputer anticipates the catastrophic impact of a giant comet

IT DOES HAPPEN HERE. A meteorite apparently dug this hole near Winslow, Arizona, just 25,000 years ago.

Space may be silent, but it is not always peaceful. The stray comets and asteroids that wander the solar system sometimes cross paths with planets, to devastating effect. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 provided an uncomfortable reminder of that fact when it walloped Jupiter in 1994. Each large fragment of the disintegrating comet created a huge black spot in the giant planet's atmosphere that was clearly visible from Earth-based telescopes. And Earth is not immune. The great pockmarks that dot Earth's crust--such as the Barringer Crater near Winslow, Arizona--present hard evidence that the planet has been struck many times in the past.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


BRUISED JUPITER. Impacts from Comet Shoemaker-Levy were clearly visible with Earth-based telescopes.

Giant impacts could have grave consequences on life on Earth; they almost surely have in the past. Most scientists now accept the theory (advanced in 1980 by Luis Alvarez and his colleagues at the University of California at Berkeley) that an asteroid about 10 kilometers in diameter crashed into Earth 65 million years ago, killing off more than half the species of life, including the dinosaurs. Recent geologic and geophysical evidence suggests that it was an exceptionally severe blow. The associated crater, called Chicxulub and located in the Yucat¿n peninsula, may be the largest impact basin to form on Earth in the past billion years.

No human eyes were around to witness that awesome blast. But researchers got a chilling vision of what the last--or next--major impact would look like during a test run of what will soon be the world's most powerful supercomputer. That machine, located at Sandia National Laboratories, is being developed for defense uses. When completed, it will be capable of 1.8 teraflops, or trillion calculations per second.

To explore the capability of the new supercomputer, Sandia researchers David Crawford and Mark Boslough simulated the impact of a comet hitting the ocean rather than the complex detonation of a nuclear weapon. The calculation assumed a one-kilometer-diameter comet weighing about a billion tons, traveling 60 kilometers per second and striking Earth's atmosphere at a 45-degree angle. This simulated body is actually rather small as comets go; Comet Hale-Bopp weighs about 10 trillion tons. Planetary scientists studying the probability of impacts estimate that one-kilometer objects strike Earth every 300,000 years or so.

Crawford and Boslough tackled the problem using a shock-physics code developed by Sandia and informally known as "bang and splat." Even on the ultrafast supercomputer the simulation required 48 hours to complete. But the effort paid off with two animated movies that dramatically illustrate the effects of a cometary collision.

The first of these, a cross-section view (at the top of this page), starts with the comet 30 kilometers above the surface. The comet produces a brilliant bow shock in the atmosphere as it speeds downward. Seven tenths of a second later it hits the ocean, unleashing an impact energy of 300 gigatons of TNT--about 10 times the explosive power of all the nuclear weapons in existence during the height of the cold war in the 1960s. The torrent of energy excavates a large transient cavity in the ocean and creates a dent in the ocean floor below.

AERIAL VIEW shows the 300 megaton explosion of the simulated comet.

The second animation--an aerial view simulating the perspective of a (very well protected) outside observer--shows that the comet itself is almost instantaneously vaporized on impact, along with 300 to 500 cubic kilometers of ocean. A high-pressure steam explosion swiftly rises into the atmosphere. Vaporized debris from the comet and water vapor are ejected into ballistic trajectories that will take them around the globe, with some of the material achieving escape velocity.

The new results graphically confirm previous ideas about the horrendous environmental effects of such a collision. "What's unique about this is we can now do three-dimensional simulations that can fully resolve all the physics of the impact," says Crawford. This type of simulation has already proven its fundamental accuracy. Two years ago Crawford and Boslough used the same computer code to simulate the Shoemaker-Levy impacts on Jupiter. Their calculations predicted that a visible plume would rise above the planet's rim, closely corresponding to what astronomers actually observed.

An impact such as the one depicted here could spell the end of modern civilization; a more powerful one, such as occurred 65 million years ago, might well mark the end of the human line. A handful of scientists have been tracking threatening objects in space and thinking about ways to head off these comet and asteroid impact hazards long before they approach Earth. Skeptics point to the technological, political and economic difficulties in developing technology that could thwart an impact. Perhaps some persuasive images will help the cause.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe