New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bats in New Zealand Set Up "Time Shares"

The nocturnal animals take turns singing at mating roosts in hopes of upping their chances of wooing a lover

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When day draws to a close in New Zealand, the forests echo with screeches. There the male lesser short-tailed bat sings up to 100,000 songs a night—more than any other animal—to woo a mate. He serenades from a special singing roost used solely for the purpose of sexual display. But not every one of these Romeos is a one-man show. After a three-year study of the nocturnal mammals' habits, Cory Toth of the University of Auckland found that males in nearly half the 12 singing roosts he observed in North Island turned the stages into time-shares. “One male will be singing, will leave, and as little as three seconds later, another male will enter the roost and start singing,” Toth says. In total, two to five males perform every night in one roost, singing for a few hours each.

Overall, the shared roosts broadcast more songs than those occupied by only one bat all night, increasing the chances that a passing female will stop by. The behavioral ecologist initially hypothesized that the time-share bats were related and worked together to ensure reproductive success for their specific gene pool. But when males in three of four singing roosts turned out to be unrelated or only distantly related, Toth's attention turned to bat size: the males that took turns on the stage were significantly larger than those who sang alone. Larger males expend more energy in the daily tasks of survival and thus might save energy at night by taking shifts singing, Toth says. In fact, DNA testing revealed that the reproductive success for larger and smaller bats within the colony was about the same, suggesting that the joint ownership arrangement helps the big guys compete with little ones.

The lesser short-tailed bat is one of only two remaining endemic land mammals in the country (the second is the long-tailed bat) and is endangered. Knowledge of the reproductive habits of the species could inform conservation efforts.

David Godkin is an award-winning science writer and frequent contributor to Scientific American and science-based biomedical engineering publications. He lives and works in Toronto.

More by David Godkin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Batty Performers” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 6 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1215-20

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe