Bird Navigation, Dark Matter, Biblical Archaeology, and More

Highlights from the April 2022 issue of Scientific American

Scientific American, April 2022

Scientific American, April 2022

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

While we sleep this spring, billions of birds will be flying through the night from their wintering grounds to their breeding territories. Bird migration is a mind-bendingly astonishing phenomenon: these tiny creatures fly thousands of kilometers with enough precision to return to the same nesting site year after year. They use three types of compass, guided by the stars, sun and, most mysteriously, Earth’s magnetic field. In this issue’s cover story, scientists Peter J. Hore and Henrik Mouritsen explain how some birds are able to “see” Earth’s magnetic field using quantum effects in exquisitely photosensitive molecules in their eyes. We hope this article will add to the enjoyment of seeing migratory birds return to your neighborhoods after a long winter.

I’ve been looking at streams with more appreciation after reading about their “hyporheic zone,” the area of streambed extending below the water and to the sides of a waterway. This hidden layer of sand and gravel, where the groundwater and stream mix, is home to small animals and larvae and microbes. As author Erica Gies describes, it’s known as the “liver of the river” because of how it keeps a waterway healthy. People who are restoring drained or dying streams are using new knowledge about the hyporheic zone to bring back thriving habitats.

Looking up from streams and beyond the birds, astronomers are planning ambitious projects to seek the source of dark matter, the invisible stuff in the universe that moves stars and galaxies. Theoretical physicist Chanda Prescod-Weinstein presents the best ideas for how to look for dark matter, some of which could get a boost this year if physicists involved in a once-a-decade planning project endorse dark matter probes as a top scientific priority. (We hope they do.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The culture of astronomy has been transformed by a wave of women entering the field (including Scientific American advisory board member Meg Urry), as writer Ann Finkbeiner observes. She is admired in science writing circles for inspiring the “Finkbeiner test,” a guide to avoiding sexist clichés when talking about women in science. Now she realizes we are in a new era, when women are proudly themselves and determined to make science more welcoming to all.

Biblical archaeology is another field being transformed, albeit fitfully. Researchers using modern analytical methods are trying to add some rigor to excavations in Jerusalem, which have been guided by scripture rather than science. Author Andrew Lawler shows how religious and international conflicts add to physical constraints (the land is very crumbly) to make this one of the most challenging places in the world to unearth true history.

Modern neuroscience began with Santiago Ramón y Cajal’s careful observations of neurons and how they interact. Author Benjamin Ehrlich details how revolutionary Cajal’s ideas were and how they changed the way we think about the brain. The painstakingly drawn illustrations are indeed wondrous.

In 1889 Scientific American shared some of Thomas Edison’s thoughts on sleep. He was against it. But he did appreciate napping—or at least the half-asleep state that led to many of his inspirations. Starting here, you can learn how to follow his advice to extract creativity from a snooze. Writer Bret Stetka tells the tale.

We’re introducing a print column this month called Mind Matters, in which experts will share recent interesting insights from social science. Enjoy, and let us know what you think.

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Magnetic Vision” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 4 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0422-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe