BP Oil Spill 5 Years Later: The Coast Is Still Struggling [Video]

Islands and shorelines remain spoiled, waiting for cleanup money

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A blowout at the Macondo oil well five years ago today touched off what has since become known as the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill, one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history. Oil washed ashore on long stretches of the Gulf of Mexico coast, killing animals and crippling communities. Last week we asked our readers to send us photos, video and written accounts of how the spill continues to affect their lives and livelihoods—including successes and failures in restoring the environment.

Overall, the responses indicate a few bright spots, but in many cases damage to ecosystems and fishing grounds has simply not been addressed. In large part this is because communities are still waiting for money from the government; 80 percent of the $13 billion BP paid in fines is supposed to go to states and communities most affected by the spill, but the money is still held up, waiting for a federal court to make final rulings on dispersement.

The long wait is hurting the seafood industry in the region. One person who responded to our request, Deborah Cotton, told us about the Community Voices Project, which she described as “a collection of video interviews with a diverse array of Gulf Coast residents who were profoundly affected by the spill.” The project, she said, “was created to ensure that the faces and words of the residents living the post-BP oil spill reality are seen and heard.” The videos, particularly of local fishermen, are engaging and give a real feel for bayou life and folks who are struggling to make a living because of the spill’s effects. One example is below.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Another reader, Jacques Hebert, sent a series of images that show how certain islands in the Gulf that were washed over by oil have become tattered wastelands. Hebert works with the Restore Mississippi River Delta campaign. One image, below, shows a tar ball he said was recently found on Grande Terre Island. He also sent a link to an article noting that in February a 25,000 pound (11,350-kilogram) tar mat of oil was found on East Grand Terre, and in March BP was cleaning it up. Hebert added that “up to 10 million gallons of oil were recently discovered on the Gulf floor, creating a ‘bathtub ring’ of oil the size of Rhode Island around the site of the disaster.”

 

Hebert made another point: land restoration is possible. As an example, he sent an image of new land created at the Lake Hermitage marsh, part of a larger project to rebuild wetlands.

 

PJ Hahn sent two images of Cat Island (below), one before the spill showing a vibrant ecosystem, and one after, revealing the oily destruction. Once a 2.5-hectare home to thousands of birds, “it has been reduced to open water,” he said. “Oil covered the mangrove trees and vegetation that flourished on the island, killing the plants and its roots. The root system is what keeps these islands in place.”

   

Today a small spit of sand from Cat Island remains, as seen in the following image from Hebert.

 

Scientific American has much more on the BP spill fallout, including an impressive graphic. Also featured is an interesting article about the mystery surrounding a large quantity of oil that has never been accounted for, after it poured up into the ocean from the rig’s ruptured wellhead—the spewing wellhead we all saw day after day in 2010 in that now-infamous underwater video.

Additional Information

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe