New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Can Soylent Replace Food?

A new product claims to make eating a thing of the past. Are you ready for life without food? 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientific American presents Nutrition Diva by Quick & Dirty Tips. Scientific American and Quick & Dirty Tips are both Macmillan companies.

I’ve gotten lots of questions about a new product called Soylent. It’s a powder that you mix with water and oil and consume in place of food. The name is sort of an inside joke referring to a 1973 science fiction film called Soylent Green. (You can google that if you’re not in on the joke.)

In any case, the Soylent you can buy today is the brain-child of a software engineer named Robert Rhinehart, who set out to create something that could completely replace food as a source of nutrition. Apparently, he got tired of the amount of time and money he was spending to plan, shop, cook, eat, and clean up after meals and wanted a simpler way to meet his nutritional needs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


He started by learning everything he could about which nutrients humans need to function and flourish. He then started mixing up raw ingredients into what he thought might be the optimal proportions. Like any self-respecting body-hacker, Rhinehart tested his invention on himself and a few other willing volunteers, going for extended periods of time without consuming anything but Soylent. Based on his own experience and feedback from others, Rhinehart tweaked the formula and ingredients until he felt that he had a winning formula.

Rosa Labs, a company founded by Rhinehart, is now selling Soylent to the public. There is also a robust DIY community experimenting with and sharing recipes for homemade versions.  So, are these guys on to something or is Soylent a bad idea?
 

> Continue reading on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe