New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Can You Be Overweight and Still Be Healthy?

Nutrition Diva: Quick and Dirty Tips for Eating Well and Feeling Fabulous

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientific American presents Nutrition Diva by Quick & Dirty Tips. Scientific American and Quick & Dirty Tips are both Macmillan companies.

There’s been a lot of buzz lately over a new study which seems to suggest that people who are overweight (but not obese) may actually have a higher life expectancy than those who are considered normal or healthy weight. In this analysis, researchers categorized people as normal weight, overweight, or obese using Body Mass Index (BMI), a number that takes into consideration your weight and your height. Many people chalked these surprising results up to the limitations of the BMI as an indicator.

The BMI doesn’t account for body composition; that is, the relative proportion of fat and muscle tissue. People often point out that a bodybuilder with lots of muscle and very little fat could easily have a BMI in the “obese” category. But let’s be honest, bodybuilders account for an extremely small fraction of the general population. As a simple tool for assessing the general population, the BMI is actually fairly reliable.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Others took these new results to mean that being overweight simply isn’t as dangerous to your health as everyone claims. I even saw bloggers suggesting that the obesity epidemic is simply a hoax dreamed up by the dieting industry to sell books and weight loss drugs. I think that’s a rather silly, not to mention dangerous, position.

Do Overweight People Live Longer?

In this latest analysis, people who were obese had the highest risk of death. But people who were in the overweight category actually had a lower risk of death than those who fell into the normal BMI category. That may seem surprising, until you consider the fact that the study lumped together people of all ages and in all states of health.

In a general population like this one, many people will end up dying of cancer, which is the second leading cause of death in most Western countries. Although obesity can increase your risk of getting cancer, people who are sick with cancer almost always lose a great deal of their body mass. People who die of old age also typically experience a loss of body mass in the last years of life. In other words, what this study really shows is that people who are very sick or very close to the end of their lives are likely to have a lower BMI. But that doesn’t mean that being heavy is a way to extend your lifespan.

In fact, when you filter out people who are underweight due to advanced age or serious illness, it’s pretty clear that being overweight increases your risk of many diseases and ultimately reduces life expectancy. The more overweight you are, the shorter your life expectancy. Statistically speaking, your long-term risks are lowest if your BMI is between 18.5 and 25. (Click here to calculate your BMI.)

Continue reading on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe