New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

China’s CO2 Emissions Might Have Finally Peaked

China has rapidly become the world leader in renewable energy, but continued coal use means it could take longer for its emissions to decline

White steam and smoke rises from smokestacks against a blue sky

A coal-fired power plant in China.

AerialPerspective Images/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

China’s carbon dioxide emissions have plateaued in 2025, indicating the country may have reached a peak after years of being the world’s top emitter.

The plateau reflects how China’s record-setting build-out of wind and solar power and rapid expansion into electric vehicles has tempered fossil-fuel emissions, according to the nonprofit Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air.

China accounts for around one third of all global greenhouse gas emissions, although historically the U.S. has emitted more carbon. Russia, the U.S. and the European Union long ago used up their “carbon budget” that would allow the world to meet the Paris Agreement goal of keeping global warming below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. China’s swift industrial growth—and its burning of coal—means that it is now close to using up its own budget, too.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


China has become a world leader in renewable energy, but it is also still adding coal-fired power plants to meet growing power demand. Still, if the flat emissions level is maintained, Beijing could see its emissions peak before its stated 2030 goal. Bringing emissions down from that peak, however, could remain a challenge.

“[A prolonged plateau] would push the world further off course from the Paris Agreement temperature goals,” Li Shuo, director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute, told E&E News’s Climatewire.

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe