New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A Coffee Sleuth Delves into the Mystery of "Potato Taste"

An entomologist describes his efforts to stop Rwanda's coffee from tasting like potatoes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Name: Thomas Miller
Title: Professor of entomology
Location: University of California, Riverside

Potato taste is a category of coffee taste, and the name is as close as professional coffee tasters can come to describing it. The term winds up categorizing that batch of coffee as undesirable.

Rwanda started having problems with potato taste about four years ago, after they started concentrating on specialty coffee. The difference between specialty coffee and regular coffee is like night and day. Specialty coffee requires a lot more work, but its price is relatively stable compared with ordinary coffee. That means that coffee represents a whopping percentage of their income. We’re talking millions of dollars that could be lost to potato taste.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I recently joined a small team to give presentations in Rwanda. They set up a tasting for us in a Starbucks, where they have a micro roaster and micro grinder on-site. The taste is very subtle, of course, but to me it had a musty sort of smell that reminded me of old cardboard paper.

We suspect that a microbe is involved, and it might be associated with a group of stinkbugs called antestia. When potato taste comes from a batch, and it can be traced back to an origin, the district is usually infested with antestia. So there’s a loose correlation with the insect. And the antestia bug by itself, regardless of this taste, damages 35 percent of the coffee yield.

My recommendation to Rwanda is to try to reproduce the system. You’ve got the insect, you’ve got the coffee bean, and you put those in a model system and turn the crank. Let’s say you come up with a really bad potato taste, then you can go backward and see where the microbe comes into the equation.

In the meantime, Rwanda can try to deal with the antestia bug because it damages coffee yield anyway. The bug lives on abandoned coffee plantations and in the mulch under banana trees, so if you do some sanitation work to get rid of it, that could help in two ways.

The trouble with the potato taste defect is you can’t see it. It’s not really clear what steps you need to take to prevent it from happening. It is a great big mystery. You’ve got yourself a nice 20 years of work before you figure out what’s causing it. 

This article was published in print as "Coffee Mystery."

Rose Eveleth is a writer and producer who explores how humans tangle with science and technology. She's the creator and host Flash Forward, a podcast about possible (and not so possible) futures, and has covered everything from fake tumbleweed farms to million dollar baccarat heists.

More by Rose Eveleth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 4This article was published with the title “A Coffee Sleuth Delves into the Mystery of 'Potato Taste'” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042012-1ykjHY0YISAGZ7yKtgQEHo

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe