Deforestation Ticks Up in Brazil's Savanna

The Cerrado is the most threatened biome in Brazil, environmentalists proclaim

Clearing of Cerrado vegetation of the subtropical savanna biome by burning in Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Deforestation in the Cerrado, a vast wooded savannah bordering the southern and eastern Brazilian Amazon, increased by 9% in 2017 compared to 2016, according to satellite data released last month by the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) in São José dos Campos.

In total, an estimated 7,408 square kilometres of land were cleared to make way for cattle pasture and croplands. Although the rate of deforestation in the Cerrado remains well below the annual levels documented from 2013 to 2015, scientists and environmentalists nonetheless warn that the savannah remains the most threatened biome in Brazil today. By comparison, the INPE registered 6,947 km2 of deforestation in the Amazon in 2017, a drop of 12% compared to the previous year (see ‘Cerrado Still Threatened’).

“In the Cerrado, we are talking about a biome that is half the size of the Amazon and has already lost half of its native vegetation,” says Ane Alencar, director of science for the Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), which is based in Brasilia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A number of factors are behind the current deforestation trends, including weaker environmental rules in the Cerrado than in the Amazon. Whereas landowners are allowed to clear only 20% of their property in the Amazon forest, they can cut down as much as 80% of the forest in the Cerrado. Scientists and environmentalists also warn that environmental enforcement in the region remains weak.

The bulk of current deforestation stems from massive agricultural expansion in the northeastern Brazilian states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia. Much of the land there is being converted to cattle pasture, but scientists say that Brazil’s powerful soya bean industry has become a major player in the deforestation in the Cerrado.

“What we are seeing now is a different pattern of occupation,” says Mercedes Bustamante, an ecologist at the University of Brasilia. “The deforestation frontiers are now being driven by soya beans in a completely new region.”

Protecting forests, biodiversity and water resources in the region will require additional action by state and federal governments in Brazil , as well as by corporations that buy and sell agricultural commodities, Alencar says.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 12, 2018.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe