Do Animals Recognize Themselves?

Marc Bekoff, professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado Boulder, explains 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Do animals really know who they are? Experts have been puzzling over this intriguing question for decades, and the responses vary depending on whom you ask and how he or she defines self-awareness.

For years the litmus test was the so-called red spot test, developed by psychologist Gordon Gallup. A researcher applies an odorless red spot to a sedated animal's forehead and then watches what happens when, fully awake, the animal confronts its image in a mirror. If it moves its paw toward the spot, the assumption is that it recognizes itself and has some degree of self-awareness.

But actually the red spot test is far too limited to reach this conclusion. First, it depends on animals knowing that mirrors create reflections—which they may not understand without previous experience. Second, and perhaps more problematic, many animals do not know what they look like; they recognize only what they smell or sound like. For instance, dogs and wolves depend heavily on olfactory cues, more so than visual ones, to navigate the world. In what I called the “yellow snow” experiments, I discovered that my dog, Jethro, could recognize his own urine and responded differently to the smell of his urine compared with that of other dogs. Animals such as Jethro may fail the red dot test but still possess some sense of self or ownership over their body and smells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The legendary naturalist Charles Darwin believed that humans are not the only self-aware beings. In his theory of evolutionary continuity, he asserted that the differences among species come in degree rather than kind. So if humans display self-awareness, other animals most likely exhibit some form of this trait as well. In my own extensive work observing wild and domestic animals, I have indeed found that many exhibit different levels of self-awareness.

Being self-aware does not necessarily translate into a sense of what I call “I-ness.” When an animal sees its reflection, for instance, it may not understand “That's me!” in the same way as a human would, but it may know that its body is its own and does not belong to someone else. Examples of this type of self-knowledge abound. Many animals know where their body is in space when they run, jump or navigate as a hunting pack or a migrating flock. Animals may also display ownership over their food, territory, family and body parts.

Although there is no easy answer to the question of self-awareness in animals, this line of inquiry leads to some fascinating insights into who animals are, what they know and how they feel. We may not grasp the extent of their self-consciousness, but I believe that an animal's awareness of its body and property ultimately equates to a sense of self.

Question submitted by Jay Jacobus via e-mail

Do you have a question about the brain you would like an expert to answer? Send it to MindEditors@sciam.com

SA Mind Vol 27 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Do animals recognize themselves?” in SA Mind Vol. 27 No. 6 (), p. 72
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1116-72b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe