New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Dolphins Whistle Their Names with Complex, Expressive Patterns

A new study quantifies how dolphins vary their “signature whistles”

Bottlenose dolphins.

Bottlenose dolphins.

Flip Nicklin/Minden Pictures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Dolphins’ “signature whistles,” which they use like names to identify themselves to others and convey personal information, have long been known as one of the most complex forms of animal communication ever studied. New research quantifies just how much these calls can vary between individuals and situations.

Experts can determine a dolphin’s signature whistle over time by listening as it calls out to its peers. The animals vary these whistles widely, repeating sections in loops, altering the pitch, and adding and deleting short segments. A new study, published in Frontiers in Marine Science, evaluates these changes through a database of nearly 1,000 recording sessions that collected whistles from around 300 individual dolphins over four decades.*

To calculate the signature whistles’ variability and allow comparison with sounds from other species (particularly birds), the authors used a statistical metric that evaluates 21 different facets of a sound—such as length, frequency, pitch and pattern. The more each individual varied the facets in each call, and the more the calls varied between different individuals, the higher the species scored. Bottlenose dolphins’ identification sounds had the largest audio palette in a recent comparison paper, followed by larks’; researchers do not yet have a consensus on how humans measure up.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This metric is good for comparing across species, says Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution marine biologist Laela Sayigh, the dolphin study’s lead author. But she notes that the 21 facets barely scratch the surface of dolphin whistles’ true complexity. “It’s actually kind of phenomenal,” Sayigh says, that even using this “coarse” metric, “dolphins are the most individually distinctive communicators.”

University of South Bohemia behavioral ecologist Pavel Linhart, who was not involved with the study but led the interspecies comparison, says he is glad the researchers tallied this variability. “I think because it was just so obvious that it’s so easy to identify [individuals], they didn’t quantify it before,” he adds.

Scientists are just beginning to explore dolphins’ reasons for varying their signature whistles—possibly to express emotional states, for one. Future work will help decipher shared, nonsignature whistles that dolphins also exchange, Sayigh says. “We’re really in the infancy of understanding those.”

*Editor’s Note (10/20/22): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the description of 1,000 whistle recording sessions. 

Rebecca Dzombak is a freelance science writer who covers Earth sciences and the world in the Anthropocene.

More by Rebecca Dzombak
Scientific American Magazine Vol 327 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Name Check” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 327 No. 5 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1122-25

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe