Droughts and Other Disasters: A Scientific American Reader

Five key SA articles from the past four years that help explain the connection between extreme weather and climate 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“With your permission,” began a letter to the editors of this magazine published in 1855 (pdf), “I will lay before you numerous and scientific readers what I imagine to be the cause of drought. I believe it is caused by the burning of coal; that the smoke arising therefrom is injurious to vegetation, to the soil, to the air and to the clouds.” The editors replied, haughtily but justifiably, “Our correspondent has not given us a single reason for his belief in coal smoke being the cause of drought….”

Here we are, 160 years later, debating whether a by-product of the burning of coal and other fossil fuels—carbon dioxide—is to blame for historic dry spells such the California’s severe drought. As our correspondent Dan Baum writes in the August issue, scientists disagree about whether climate change is responsible for California’s problems, but no matter the cause, this drought looks like much more than a temporary hardship—it could fundamentally reshape the culture and economy of the state.

California is not the only place experiencing drought and other weather extremes, of course. In recent years extreme weather has been an increasingly frequent topic for expert discussion in this magazine. Here’s a selection of recent SA pieces on drought, severe weather, climate and the challenges they pose.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


1. “The Jet Stream Is Getting Weird,” by Jeff Masters (December 2014)
Why extreme summers and winters of the past four years could become the norm

2. “The Coming Mega Drought,” by Peter H. Gleick and Matthew Heberger (January 2012)
The southwestern U.S. looks a lot like Australia before its nine-year dry spell

3. “After the Deluge,” by John A. Carey (December 2011)
A spate of floods, droughts and heat waves is prompting city and state leaders to take bold steps to protect their people and property

4. “Casualties of Climate Change,” by Alex de Sherbinin, Koko Warner and Charles Ehrhart (January 2011)
Shifts in rainfall patterns and shorelines will contribute to mass migrations on a scale never before seen

5. “A Puzzle for the Planet,” by Michael E. Webber (February 2015)
Our future rides on our ability to integrate energy, water and food

Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Droughts and Other Disasters: A Scientific American Reader” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082015-6A2KY06b40g1PQYXmkILii

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe