Even ‘Twilight Zone’ Coral Reefs Aren’t Safe from Bleaching

Coral reefs hundreds of feet below the ocean surface aren’t as safe as scientists thought

An underwater view showing recovered corals.

Recovering corals at the Chagos Archipelago.

University of Plymouth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As marine biologist Nicola Foster and her colleagues steered a remote-controlled submersible through the coral reefs of the Indian Ocean's Chagos Archipelago, they saw corals full of color near the surface. But nearly 300 feet below, in the dimmer and colder waters of what oceanographers call the “twilight zone,” some corals had turned ghostly white, leaving them vulnerable to disease and death.

“It wasn't something we were expecting to see,” says Foster, who studies deeper-water coral ecosystems called mesophotic reefs at the University of Plymouth in England. Mesophotic reefs would seem to be buffered from rising sea-surface temperatures that blanch higher-up corals. But this team's 2019 observations, published recently in Nature Communications, show the deepest instance of bleaching ever recorded—suggesting similar reefs are more vulnerable than previously believed.

Bleaching often happens when warming water prompts corals to expel the colorful algae that live in their tissues and help to sustain them. Although surface waters weren't atypically warm when Foster and her team took their measurements, the twilight zone waters neared 84 degrees Fahrenheit (29 degrees Celsius)—far above the 68- to 75-degree range in which mesophotic corals thrive.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers realized that bleaching corresponded with the timing of the Indian Ocean Dipole, a climate pattern similar to El Niño. This phenomenon shifts the region's surface winds and ocean currents, says study co-author Phil Hosegood, a physical oceanographer at the University of Plymouth. Wind and waves stir the upper ocean, keeping it relatively warm and uniform in temperature. But the 2019 dipole deepened this well-mixed upper layer; the thermocline (the slice of ocean that separates warm upper waters from the frigid depths) had plunged deeper than normal. “Those corals were exposed to temperatures that are normally found at the surface,” Hosegood says. Researchers may have missed similar bleaching events in the past by not looking deep enough, he adds.

“This observation is really important,” says Gonzalo Pérez-Rosales, who has studied similar ecosystems as a coral reef ecologist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, because it suggests mesophotic reefs elsewhere could also be bleaching. For instance, Hosegood says, El Niño may cause similar thermocline deepening in parts of the Pacific.

Fortunately, the corals in this study had largely recovered their color by 2022, Foster notes. But each bleaching stresses the corals and, if prolonged, can starve them. Another Indian Ocean Dipole event had already begun deepening the warm waters in this area by late fall of 2023, Hosegood says. He hopes future studies will reveal the physical processes behind where thermoclines deepen and how long this can last. Future Indian Ocean Dipole patterns are likely to be more severe, he says, noting that data suggest “that these natural cycles are becoming amplified with climate change.”

Carolyn Wilke is a Chicago-based science journalist who covers chemistry, materials and animal oddities.

More by Carolyn Wilke
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Twilight Zone” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 2 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0224-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe