New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Explained: The Supertide That Swallowed a French Abbey

The moon, sun and some shenanigans between them brought a 14-meter tide to the coast of France
 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A stunning photo went viral over the weekend, revealing a supertide that turned an 11th-century French abbey that is usually surrounded by sheep into an island swallowed by the sea. The image, from AP, is shown here.
 
Similar photos from other news agencies also ran rampant on the Web. Thousands of people arrived on the coast of Normandy to watch the spectacular 14-meter-high surge of water envelop Mont Saint-Michel, the enclave around the abbey—usually accessible only by a causeway, which was overtopped by the tide.
 
The articles that accompanied such photos failed to explain why this supertide happened, or made vague references to the sun, or the moon, or the alignment of the sun and moon, or the eclipse that occurred the same day—and without attribution to any expert or scientific institution. Many also referred to the March 20-21 event as the “tide of the century,” even though it arises every 18 years. The previous occurrence was in March 1997, and the next one will be in March 2033.
 
So what caused the supertide? A strong clue is the repeat of “March” in the dates. Tides are driven by the moon’s gravitational pull. The sun’s gravity has an effect, too, although much smaller. When the sun and moon are aligned with Earth, their combined pull is greatest, creating what are called spring tides. They occur twice every month, but are often greatest in March and September, during the spring and autumn equinoxes.*
 
This year the moon and sun aligned very exactly, causing Saturday’s eclipse. “If we see a solar eclipse there will be a spring tide,” Hal Needham, a climatologist at Louisiana State University, told me. “But if we see a spring tide it doesn't mean we will see a solar eclipse.”

But what explains the recurrence of March for the highest of tides?* And why the 18-year cycle? This gets trickier. The best explanation, which Needham emailed me, comes from the U.K. Met Office, Britain’s official meteorological agency. Experts at the Met wrote in a blog that some spring tides are higher than others “because tidal forces are strengthened if the moon is closest to earth in its elliptical orbit. Tide forces are also enhanced when the sun and the moon are directly over the equator. For the sun this happens on or around 21 March or September. The moon’s orbit also takes it above and below the equator over a period of 27.2 days. Just as with the sun, the tide-generating forces are at their greatest when the moon is directly overhead at the equator.”

The Met also noted, “Very large spring tides occur when these astronomical factors coincide. Approximately every 4.5 years the moon is closest to the earth, and is also overhead at the equator.” So when the moon and sun align, and they are directly over the equator, and the moon is closest to earth, we get the so-called supertide.
 
Needham also noted, however, that the weather can have a greater influence on tides than any of these factors—witness Hurricane Sandy in New York City or Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. One 18-year supertide might be higher than another depending on whether winds are pushing water up against a coastline and whether atmospheric pressure is lower than normal, which can cause a local rise in sea level.
 
This weekend’s supertide was felt around the world and was most extreme in places that are prone to excessive tides. In North America, the most famous site is the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia, where the tide can rise and fall by 10 meters even on a ho-hum day. There is no thousand-year-old abbey in the middle of the bay, however, so I guess people were not posting photos from there on Saturday.

*Clarification (3/26/15): This paragraph was edited after posting to describe more accurately the frequency of spring tides.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe