New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Newly discovered ‘fire amoeba’ pushes the boundaries of life on Earth

It was thought that complex cells couldn’t survive above a certain temperature, but a tiny amoeba has proven that assumption wrong

Amoeba blobs moving around

Incendiamoeba cascadensis (meaning “fire amoeba ... from the Cascades,” according to a recent preprint paper) is seen moving around in a zoomed-in microscopic view.

“A Geothermal Amoeba Sets a New Upper Temperature Limit for Eukaryotes,” by H. Beryl Rappaport et al. Preprint posted to bioRxiv on November 24, 2025 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A tiny amoeba has broken a pretty big record.

The newly discovered species of single-celled organism can divide and reproduce at a piping hot 63 degrees Celsius (145 degrees Fahrenheit), a higher temperature than possible for any other known complex form of life. The discovery, described in a preprint study on the server bioRxiv and not yet peer-reviewed, “pushes the boundaries of our understanding of life’s limits on Earth and the implications for life beyond Earth—where else and how else life might be able to take hold and thrive,” says microbial ecologist and astrobiologist Luke McKay, who was not involved with the study.

Much of the existing research into extremophiles—life-forms that thrive at extreme temperatures, acidity levels, or other environmental conditions—has concentrated on bacteria and archaea that lack a nucleus or membrane-bound cell organelles. The record-holding organism for withstanding high temperature is an archaean, Methanopyrus kandleri, which can grow at temperatures of 122 degrees C. The most heat-loving bacteria, Geothermobacterium ferrireducens, can grow at temperatures up to 100 degrees C.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But conventional wisdom since the early 1970s had been that eukaryotes—organisms with a cell nucleus, from amoebas to animals—would not be able to cope with high temperatures as readily because of their more complex biology. High temperatures can, for example, cause proteins necessary for life to fall apart. Before now, eukaryotes had been shown to tolerate temperatures up to only about 60 degrees C, and scientists typically assumed they could tolerate nothing higher than 62 degrees C.

Steam rises from yellow and brownish earth and blue-green geothermal ponds

Lassen Volcanic National Park.

John Elk/Getty Images

To explore the world of eukaryote extremophiles, microbiologists Angela Oliverio and Beryl Rappaport, both at Syracuse University, and some of their colleagues took samples from Lassen Volcanic National Park, in the Cascade mountain range in northern California, and cultured them in flasks back in their laboratory. Within a few weeks of sample growth, researchers spotted the never-before-seen amoeba species in flasks that had been kept at temperatures similar to those of the stream it was found in. As the researchers notched up the temperature, the amoeba, dubbed Incendiamoeba cascadensis (meaning “fire amoeba from the Cascades,” according to the preprint), kept on going. It was able to replicate itself in temperatures of up to 63 degrees C, remain active at up to 64 degrees C, and form a protective coating and survive encased in it at up to 70 degrees C, reawakening when the temperature was lowered again. “Our minds were kind of blown at that point,” Oliverio says.

The researchers also sequenced the amoeba’s genome and looked at its proteome, the proteins its genes are predicted to produce. Their findings suggest its go-to proteins have a higher average melting temperature than those of its nearest amoeba relative.

“The difference between 60 and 63 degrees C may sound small but represents a relatively large shift in our current understanding of eukaryotic limits,” says McKay, who works at biotechnology research company Symbiotic Biosystems.

“A Geothermal Amoeba Sets a New Upper Temperature Limit for Eukaryotes,” by H. Beryl Rappaport et al. Preprint posted to bioRxiv on November 24, 2025 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0); Aerial Filmworks/Getty Images

The new finding has implications beyond just biology: for instance, understanding how such organisms survive high heat can help researchers develop heat-tolerant proteins and enzymes for other applications. “Why would I care about an amoeba in a random national park?” Oliverio says. “Well, your laundry detergent might be improved.”

But she dwells more on the existential implications: “It raises a lot of interesting questions about what are the constraints” on life, Oliverio says. “And we have really no idea. We sampled the stream and got this amoeba from one geothermal area. There could be hotter things out there. There probably are.”

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Fiery Amoeba” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 2 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022026-6sFkqEtO4A7XnFE97vzYqH

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe