New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Eye Movement May Be Key to Retrieve Unconscious Memories

Where we look reveals memories we cannot consciously access

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Do you remember how your breakfast plate was arranged this morning? Even if you don’t, your hippo­campus might—and growing evidence suggests that there is a way to retrieve this unconscious memory: through your eye movements.

The latest study comes from the University of California, Davis, where neuroscientist Deborah Hannula and her team showed participants photographs of faces superimposed on scenes. Later the volunteers saw the individual scenes again and had to pick the matching faces. By tracking their eye movements, Hannula and her co-workers saw that even when volunteers picked the wrong face, their eyes were drawn for a longer time to the correct one.

Previous studies yielded similar results, but the findings have been controver­sial because of difficulties replicat­ing them, Hannula says. Her study also showed that the participants’ hippocampus was ac­tive during the process, indicating that, contrary to conventional thinking, the brain region is involved not only in conscious memory processing but in other memory tasks as well.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings suggest that eye movements can be a sensitive measure for both unconscious and conscious memories, Hannula says. This fact could open up new avenues for working with cognitively impaired patients, who may not be able to verbally or otherwise report what they remember.

The results also have im­plications for crime scene in­vestigations, Hannula says. For example, eyewitnesses may unconsciously remember the face of a perpetrator. Even the eye movements of the person who committed the crime could betray important information. “Imagine the perpetrator used a knife that was in the butcher block on the counter next to the refrigerator,” she says. Viewing pictures of that scene would likely draw their eye movements to that butcher block.

Note: This story was originally printed with the title "Eye Giveaway"

SA Mind Vol 20 Issue 7This article was published with the title “Eye Giveaway” in SA Mind Vol. 20 No. 7 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0110-16a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe