New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Five-Eyed, Nozzle-Nosed Oddity Lingered Far beyond the Cambrian Period

This ancient creature swam in surprisingly modern seas

Mieridduryn visualized.

Mieridduryn visualized.

Franz Anthony

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

More than a century ago paleontologist Charles Doolittle Walcott uncovered a very strange fossil in Canada. The finger-sized animal was utterly alien compared to anything around today: it looked like a lobster tail with five eyes and a nozzlelike trunk at one end. This 508-million-year-old organism, named Opabinia regalis, seemed an isolated expression of evolution running riot back in the Cambrian period—before a mass extinction swept such oddities away. But now scientists have discovered that such enigmatic creatures survived for tens of millions of years longer than previously thought.

Only last year Harvard University paleontologist Joanna Wolfe and her colleagues described the second such specimen ever found, called Utaurora. This creature, unearthed in Utah, was related to Opabinia and lived at a similar time. But the day this find was published, Wolfe saw a photograph taken by fellow researcher Stephen Pates that would fundamentally change these organisms’ story. Pates had just found a third Opabinia-like creature in Wales—in rocks about 40 million years younger than the first two specimens. This oddball would have lived when more modern-looking animals, such as snails, cephalopods and corals, were on the rise.

“My very first reaction was actually that it couldn’t be,” Wolfe says. The fossil seemed too poorly preserved to immediately identify. But the discovery of another, higher-quality fossil and analysis showing key characteristics in common with Opabinia eventually convinced Wolfe. She, Pates and other researchers recently published the finding in Nature Communications.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At first glance the new fossil resembles a smear on gray stone. But up close, it clearly shares telltale traits with Opabinia. Wolfe and her colleagues called the animal Mieridduryn (“bramble snout” in Welsh) for its spiky proboscis.

Finding such specimens in Wales came as a surprise. “Fossils from the Llandrindod Wells area have been studied for many decades and were thought to contain only shelly fossils like trilobites,” says paleontologist Rich Howard of the Natural History Museum in London, who was not involved with the discovery. No one was looking for small, soft-bodied creatures there. Such fossils are invaluable for understanding the origins and early days of groups such as arthropods and their soft-bodied precursors.

Mieridduryn lived during the Ordovician period, as Earth’s oceans were starting to resemble something a little more familiar to us today. Various other Cambrian oddities are now known to have lived beyond the mass extinction into that new era—and researchers are still investigating how they did so, as well as why they ultimately vanished. “We have more questions now about how opabiniids may have survived and what kinds of environments or life histories they were restricted to,” Wolfe says. And now she has an additional 40’million years’ worth of rocks to examine for clues.

Riley Black, who formerly wrote under the name Brian Switek, is the author of Skeleton Keys and My Beloved Brontosaurus. She lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. Follow her on Twitter @Laelaps and on Instagram @laelaps

More by Riley Black
Scientific American Magazine Vol 328 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Cambrian Oddity” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 328 No. 2 (), p. 17
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0223-17

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe