New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Gastric Bypass Makes Gut Burn Sugar Faster

Diabetic rats were found to control blood glucose better after undergoing the weight-loss surgery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A procedure increasingly used to treat obesity by reducing the size of the stomach also reprograms the intestines, making them burn sugar faster, a study in diabetic and obese rats has shown.

If the results, published today in Science, hold true in humans, they could explain how gastric bypass surgery improves sugar control in people with diabetes. They could also lead to less invasive ways to produce the same effects.

“This opens up the idea that we could take the most effective therapy we have for obesity and diabetes and come up with ways to do it without a scalpel,” says Randy Seeley, an obesity researcher at the University of Cincinnati in Ohio, who was not involved in the work.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As rates of obesity and diabetes skyrocket in many countries, physicians and patients are turning to operations that reconfigure the digestive tract so that only a small part of the stomach is used. Such procedures are intended to allow people to feel full after smaller meals, reducing the drive to consume extra calories. But clinical trials in recent years have shown that they can also reduce blood sugar levels in diabetics, even before weight is lost.

“We have to think about this surgery differently,” says Seeley. “It’s not just changing the plumbing, it’s altering how the gut handles glucose.”

Work-around
Nicholas Stylopoulos, an obesity researcher at the Boston Children’s Hospital in Massachusetts, and his colleagues decided to learn more about this mechanism by studying one of the most popular weight-loss procedures, the Roux-en-Y bypass. The surgery reduces the stomach to about the size of a hen's egg, and rearranges the intestines into the shape of a Y. The arm of the Y that is connected to the reduced stomach pouch is called the Roux limb.

Stylopoulos and his team performed the surgery on obese and non-obese diabetic rats, and then watched for changes in the Roux limb. They found that blood levels of compounds and proteins indicative of sugar use were higher in these rats than in controls that underwent a sham operation. The researchers then injected the Roux-en-Y-treated rats labeled glucose and imaged the animals' digestive tracts. They found that the Roux limb was taking up and using the sugar, perhaps to compensate for receiving fewer digested nutrients from the shrunken stomach.

The team now hopes to study this process in biopsies from humans who have undergone the procedure, says Stylopoulos. In particular, he and his colleagues want to focus on the role of a protein called GLUT1, which transports glucose into cells. Rats that had been given a Roux-en-Y bypass had higher levels of GLUT1 in the Roux limb than controls, and chemically inhibiting the protein halted the uptake of labeled glucose by the Roux limb.

That, says Stylopoulos, suggests that GLUT1 may be a useful target in the hunt for drugs that could reproduce the effects of a gastric bypass.

The hunt may heat up as surgeons weigh the risks of performing bypasses on obese children, and on adults with diabetes who are only slightly overweight, notes Stylopoulos. “It’s all still very controversial,” he says. “The hope is that one day we can bypass the bypass.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on July 25, 2013.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe