Glaciers, Not Floods, on Mars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Courtesy of AGU

Lineations on the plains of Mars show evidence that they were carved by glacial ice, not floods. Using the Antarctic as her model, Baerbel K. Lucchitta has concluded that the flutes and drumlines may have been gouged by ice streams. Several regions in the Antarctic seafloor (in the Ross Sea, just off the Ross and Ronne Ice Shelves), which were recently imaged with sonar, are "strikingly similar" to outflow channels in the Kasei Valles and Ares Vallis, Lucchitta writes in an article to be published February 1 in the Journal of Geophysical Research Letters.

As in the Antarctic, the channels left by ice streams seem to be "grounded" below the shoreline of the hypothetical ocean that once filled Mars¿s northern plains (see images above). The channels are also inclined downstream, which is typical of ice flows that can push up inclines. Such gouge marks are unlikely to be made with moving water, which cannot flow uphill for extended distances, even during large-scale flooding.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lucchitta, a geologist at the U.S. Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Ariz., speculates that the ice was melted in the ground, perhaps due to a change in the planet¿s atmospheric pressure or because of heating by the Tharsis volcanoes, which are in the vicinity of the Kasai Valles. The meltwater would have shot up like a geyser and frozen again, building up until it could flow in an icestream. Another possible source, she suggests, is an ice cap that may have sat on the Tharsis rise.

Lucchitta¿s final conclusions are that large-scale catastrophic floods may not have been necessary to carve the surface of Mars: smaller floods may have given rise to ice streams that inexorably flowed over debris and dust, in the same way ice flows on the Antarctic seafloor.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe