Head Lines: Spotting a Fake Smile

Also: Men Who Can Move; Borrowed Identity; Speaking of Race; and Marrying Mom

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spotting a Fake Smile
At least one good thing comes from a breakup: a better fake-smile detector. Social psychologist Michael Bernstein and his colleagues at Miami University found that people who felt rejected were better at discriminating between fake and real smiles. Researchers believe that a true grin indicates real emotions, such as cooperation, because some of the muscles we use—the ones around the eyes—are not under our conscious control. Our ancestors needed to be accepted in a group to survive, Bernstein says, so an outsider would not want to waste energy by acting on a fake reaction—or to miss a real opportunity to be included. —Rachel Mahan

Men Who Can Move
Most women agree that a man who can dance is attractive—and a recent study helps to explain why. Men who were exposed to higher levels of testosterone in the womb are judged by women to be better dancers. Peter Lovatt of the University of Hertfordshire in England found that the coordination and complexity of a man’s dancing, as well as the size of his movements, affect how attractive, masculine and dominant he appears to women. “We know that testosterone has an impact on physical characteristics,” Lovatt says. “It might be the case that higher-testosterone men have greater control over their bodies.” Dancing joins athleticism, musical ability and facial symmetry on a growing list of traits that increase a man’s attractiveness and are associated with prenatal testosterone levels. —Clara Moskowitz

Borrowed Identity
Cloaking oneself in a new identity—even for only a few minutes—can disrupt long-established patterns of behavior, new research suggests. Stanford University psychologists staged an online game in which players represented by on-screen avatars competed to solve a series of math problems. Subjects’ real gender didn’t affect their scores, but those who were arbitrarily assigned to a female avatar and who competed against two male avatars performed worse and gave up on difficult problems more quickly than did those who were assigned a male avatar and whose opponents were female. A large body of work shows that when women are reminded of their gender, their math performance suffers—but this study is the first to suggest that the effect of identity may not be tied to a lifetime of experiences. —Siri Carpenter


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Speaking of Race
White people often avoid mentioning race because they fear that even noticing skin color might somehow make them appear racist, but two new studies from psychologists at Tufts and Harvard universities show that such “strategic colorblindness” can backfire. White participants studied a batch of photographs, then tried to deduce, as quickly as possible, which picture a black partner was holding by asking questions about each one in succession. Asking whether the person pictured was black or white would have sped up their per­formance, yet subjects—adults in one study and children as young as age 10 in the other—rarely mentioned race unless their partner did so first. Black observers who watched the recorded interactions perceived whites who avoided talking about race as more prejudiced than the intrepid few who acknowledged skin color. And blacks who watched silent video clips of the interactions even rated whites who avoided mentioning race as having more unfriendly nonverbal behavior. —Siri Carpenter

Marrying Mom?
A new study suggests that we prefer mates who resemble our opposite-sex parent. A Hungarian team found correlations of facial proportions between men and their partner’s father and between women and their part­ner’s mother. The findings support a “sexual imprinting” hypothesis: children shape a mental template of their opposite-sex parent and search for a partner who looks like it. —Nicole Branan

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
SA Mind Vol 20 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Men Who Can Move” in SA Mind Vol. 20 No. 1 (), p. 7
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0209-7

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe