Here’s How to Use Window Films to Actually Protect Birds

Bird-strike-deterrent window films don’t work if they’re placed on the indoor side

A male cardinal flying with its wings outspread.

Alan Murphy/BIA/Minden Pictures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Hundreds of millions of birds die every year from smashing into windows, one of the biggest sources of human-caused bird deaths—far greater than wind turbines and airplane strikes combined. In a bid to help birds see the panes before it's too late, people may stick decals or tinted films on their windows—often on the indoor side. But a recent study in PeerJ Life & Environment shows that such films work only on a window's outside surface.

“Putting these window films on the inside really is not giving you the benefit that you would want for protecting the birds,” says John P. Swaddle, a biologist at the College of William and Mary and lead author of the new study.

To test the films' effectiveness, Swaddle and his colleagues applied one of two commercially available films to either interior or exterior window surfaces. One film reflected shorter light wavelengths that humans cannot see, and the other reflected longer wavelengths (many birds can see both). The researchers also mounted superfine nets in front of the windows to keep birds from actually hitting the glass. Both films helped to prevent bird strikes by more than 35 percent when put on the outside surface, the study found—but films on the inside had no benefit at all.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“It's some groundbreaking work about the nuances of what can and can't work in terms of preventing window strikes from birds,” says George Mason University biologist David Luther, who studies the evolution of birds in cities and was not involved in the study.

People usually find it much easier to put films or decals on the indoor side of a window, says Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela, a conservation ecologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was also not involved in the study. For taller buildings, to apply something to the outside, “you need scaffolding ... you need to clean the windows extra well for them to apply correctly, and they don't last as long.”

Swaddle hypothesizes that films placed on the inside don't effectively interrupt the reflection and scatter of exterior light. This might also be the case with decals, although those were not tested in this study, he says. In future studies, the researchers will continue exploring how birds see and experience the world, which could further help bird lovers, architects and manufacturers prevent avian deaths.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe