New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Honeybees Social Distance to Prevent Disease, Too

The insects balance separation and care for those infected by parasites

Honeybees.

Redmond Durrell/Alamy Stock Photo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Humans are not the only animals that practice social distancing to deal with a deadly pathogen: A new study shows honeybees change their behavior and use of space to avoid spreading Varroa destructor mites, which feed on bees’ organs and can harbor nasty viruses. Researchers observed these changes in wild and caged bees infected with the mites, which are one of the biggest global threats to honeybees.

The team found that in the infected wild populations, older forager bees would perform foraging dances—which they use to show other bees where to find food—near the periphery of the hive. These actions seemed intended to avoid sickening the young nurse bees and larvae in the hive’s center. The infected wild bees also groomed one another for parasites more intensely in the center of the hive, among the more valuable young bees. The findings were reported in Science Advances.

“We interpreted this change in the social organization as a possible strategy to limit the spread of the parasite within the hive,” says lead study author Michelina Pusceddu, an agricultural scientist at the University of Sassari in Italy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As predicted, the infected bees in cages received more grooming than uninfected bees. But contrary to expectations, the infected bees engaged in more socializing as well, such as touching antennae and sharing regurgitated food. This may reflect a trade-off between limiting disease spread and maintaining communication, the authors say. “Probably social distancing is too costly at a small scale or within the same cohort,” notes senior study author Alberto Satta, also at the University of Sassari.

The study provides an example of how “we can find evidence for really complicated behavioral changes that [social animals] have—like the social distancing phenomenon—to deal with the special challenges of living in a big social group,” says Adam Dolezal, an entomologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who was not involved with the new study. Dolezal’s own research has shown that honeybees reduce their contact with bees infected with a pathogen called Israeli acute paralysis virus, which the insects can detect by smell.

Black garden ants, lobsters, birds and nonhuman primates also show social distancing behavior. But for any social animal, keeping one’s distance comes with a cost.

Tanya Lewis was formerly senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She wrote and edited stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appeared on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and wrote Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She held a number of positions over her nearly 10 years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Social Insect Distancing” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 2 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0222-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe