Honeybees Social Distance to Prevent Disease, Too

The insects balance separation and care for those infected by parasites

Honeybees.

Redmond Durrell/Alamy Stock Photo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Humans are not the only animals that practice social distancing to deal with a deadly pathogen: A new study shows honeybees change their behavior and use of space to avoid spreading Varroa destructor mites, which feed on bees’ organs and can harbor nasty viruses. Researchers observed these changes in wild and caged bees infected with the mites, which are one of the biggest global threats to honeybees.

The team found that in the infected wild populations, older forager bees would perform foraging dances—which they use to show other bees where to find food—near the periphery of the hive. These actions seemed intended to avoid sickening the young nurse bees and larvae in the hive’s center. The infected wild bees also groomed one another for parasites more intensely in the center of the hive, among the more valuable young bees. The findings were reported in Science Advances.

“We interpreted this change in the social organization as a possible strategy to limit the spread of the parasite within the hive,” says lead study author Michelina Pusceddu, an agricultural scientist at the University of Sassari in Italy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As predicted, the infected bees in cages received more grooming than uninfected bees. But contrary to expectations, the infected bees engaged in more socializing as well, such as touching antennae and sharing regurgitated food. This may reflect a trade-off between limiting disease spread and maintaining communication, the authors say. “Probably social distancing is too costly at a small scale or within the same cohort,” notes senior study author Alberto Satta, also at the University of Sassari.

The study provides an example of how “we can find evidence for really complicated behavioral changes that [social animals] have—like the social distancing phenomenon—to deal with the special challenges of living in a big social group,” says Adam Dolezal, an entomologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who was not involved with the new study. Dolezal’s own research has shown that honeybees reduce their contact with bees infected with a pathogen called Israeli acute paralysis virus, which the insects can detect by smell.

Black garden ants, lobsters, birds and nonhuman primates also show social distancing behavior. But for any social animal, keeping one’s distance comes with a cost.

Tanya Lewis is senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She writes and edits stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appears on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and writes Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She has held a number of positions over her nine years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Social Insect Distancing” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 2 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0222-19

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe