How Did Life Begin on Earth?

Life on Earth could have arisen in places similar to the Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone National park.

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

There was light. But then what happened?

How did life arise on the third rocky planet orbiting the unremarkable star at the center of our solar system? Humans have been wondering about the answer to that question probably almost as long as we've been able to wonder. In recent decades scientists have made some gains in understanding the conceivable mechanisms, gradually settling on a possible picture of our origins in the oceans. The idea was that hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the seas, protected from cataclysms rending the surface four billion years ago, delivered the necessary energy and could have sustained the molecules needed.

Perhaps not. Water was a necessary ingredient, surely, but that doesn't mean we sprang from oceans, according to researchers Martin J. Van Kranendonk, David W. Deamer and Tara Djokic in our cover story, “Life Springs.” Oceans, they write, might have spread the needed molecules too quickly for cell membranes and functions to occur. Instead they argue, land pools in an active volcanic landscape that repeatedly dried and got wet again could have cradled the seeds of life. How could something that sounds so harsh have been beneficial, you ask? Read the article to find out.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sun's rays provided vitality for this world. Seeing them dim temporarily, as they do during a solar eclipse, is awe-inspiring. It's been nearly a century since a total solar eclipse has crossed the U.S. from coast to coast. You'll find that “The Great Solar Eclipse of 2017,” by Jay M. Pasachoff, tells you everything you need to know about this rare event. And a companion piece, “1,000 Years of Solar Eclipses,” by senior editor Mark Fischetti, with illustrations by senior graphics editor Jen Christiansen and designer Jan Willem Tulp, tells you what you will need to know as well. I like to think that the readers of Scientific American, which turns 172 this month, will be enjoying the solar shows well into the future.

If they do enjoy them, it'll be because we've fostered a love of learning about the world around us. How we teach and create the right learning environments are critical to our students' success. For that reason, we've taken an evidence-based look at the concept of vouchers in education in “A Matter of Choice,” by journalist Peg Tyre. The concept is a keystone of the current administration's plan to revamp education, but research finds it wanting. Fortunately, there is still time to make a choice.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 2This article was published with the title “In the Beginning” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 2 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082017-6tvEJFe02VCMRtrUfKlvcu

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe