New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How do deep-sea fish see in dark water? This new study could hold the clue

Three species of Red Sea fish appear to rely on special “hybrid” retina cells to see in dim environments

A close-up of Maurolicus mucronatus

Maurolicus mucronatus, a hatchetfish.

Wen-Sung Chung

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some deep-sea fish may be able to see light in a different way from most other vertebrates, according to a new study. The fish, found in the Red Sea, have what the scientists behind the new study describe as “hybrid” photoreceptors—light-sensing cells in the retina that combine elements of two distinct kinds of photoreceptors, cones and rods.

In human retinas, cone cells enable us to see in bright environments, detecting color and fine detail, while rods are sensitive to low light, enabling us to see in the dark. But not all animals’ eyes work that way.

Scientists found the hybrid photoreceptors in larvae from three species of fish found in the Red Sea—members of the hatchetfish, lanternfish and lightfish groups, all of which live in mostly dark, deep water. One of the fish, a hatchetfish, maintains these hybrid cells into adulthood.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The ocean’s twilight zone isn’t an ideal environment for either rod or cone cells, explains Lily Fogg, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Basel in Switzerland and the lead author of the study. “From a visual perspective, that’s a bit of a nightmare,” she says.

Yet many deep-sea fish often start their lives there, which raised the question: “How do these tiny larvae see well enough to feed, avoid predators, and survive in the murky midwater depths?” Fogg says.

The answer lied in the back of their eyes. By examining the retinas of the fish larvae, Fogg and her colleagues found cells with features of both rods and cones. While hatchetfish hold on to these cells as adults, lanternfish and lightfish seem to lose them, developing only rods. The findings suggest photoreceptors don’t exist as two rigid categories—rods and cones—Fogg says, “but rather along a spectrum.”

The findings, published Wednesday in Science Advances, could add to researchers’ understanding about how sight developed in vertebrates.

Similar photoreceptors have been found in other species, including jawless fishes and some reptiles and amphibians, Fogg says. Taken together, the evidence “hints that this flexibility may be a deeply rooted feature of vertebrate vision rather than an odd exception.”

“It’s a reminder that biology is rarely as simple as we think it is,” she says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe