Where on Earth You Are--Working Knowledge on Global Positioning System

How handheld global positioning system devices can determine your position on Earth--even when indoors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This holiday season all kinds of products are coming equipped with GPS receivers to tell consumers exactly where on earth they are. The choices include dashboard navigators for cars, pocket navigators for humans, “golf buddies” that reveal the distance between a golfer and greens and sand traps, and, most prominently, cell phones. GPS transponders also now track paroled criminals, errant pets, migrating elephants and retreating glaciers.

Positioning satellites have been beaming signals for decades, but three converging factors are broadening the marketplace, according to Per K. Enge, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at Stanford University. The size of the circuitry needed inside a receiver has shrunk. Circuit makers are selling that hardware to consumer electronics manufacturers for less than $5 a unit. “And Apple provided visibility,” Enge says, “by putting GPS into the iPhone.” Buyers loved it, proving there was a desire.

As handy as personal navigators might be, their accuracy has remained within five to 10 meters for years. They will improve only after satellites surrounding the planet are upgraded. The current satellites each send a single radio-frequency signal to civilian receivers, which then combine signals from four satellites to determine position. But the ionosphere can cause slight and random delays, introducing error into the receiver’s calculations. Next-generation satellites will each send three signals at slightly different frequencies, giving receivers the data they need to cancel out the delays, resulting in accuracy of less than 50 centimeters. The first three-frequency satellite is supposed to be launched in 2009.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Do civilians need such specificity? Perhaps not, although surveyors and scientists would. More enticing, Enge maintains, are systems that work better in large cities and indoors. GPS does not perform well in these places because buildings, roofs and walls block the incoming signals. So-called hybrid, or augmented, GPS receivers, which are now beginning to be deployed, also receive broadcasts from nearby television, cell phone or Wi-Fi (for “wireless fidelity”) transmitters that provide receivers with added data about position. These broadcasts can fill urban canyons and penetrate buildings. Similarly, smaller transmitters sprinkled throughout skyscrapers will eventually solve the long-standing “problem of the vertical,” which current GPS cannot do: determining not just that a visitor is at the Empire State Building, but whether he is on the seventh or 70th floor.

Did You Know ...
TRI AGAIN: Most colloquial descriptions of GPS say the technology uses triangulation to determine the position of a receiver on the earth. Mathematically speaking, the system uses trilateration. Triangulation determines position by measuring the angles of the triangles formed between an observer and three known points. Trilateration determines position by measuring the distance from an observer to three known points; the timing signals sent from GPS satellites (the known points) to a receiver determine those distances.

SATELLITE ENVY: More than 24 U.S. Navstar satellites make up the GPS system. Although it could provide service anywhere on the planet, some nations prefer independence. Russia has its own constellation called GLONASS; begun during the cold war, it was failing by the early 2000s but is being revived. Europe plans to complete its Galileo system by 2013. China is sending its Compass hardware aloft now. India wants to complete IRNSS by 2012—which would provide just enough satellites to cover its region. And Japan will float three satellites known as QZSS to augment GPS coverage over its territory.

Note: This article was originally published with the title, "Where On Earth You Are".

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Where on Earth You Are” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 6 (), p. 116
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122008-5V4lrAycWN0RyBRL7iyEwU

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe