New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How to Overcome Your Fear of Flying (Part 2)

In Part 1 of this series, the Savvy Psychologist covered 5 ways to get to your destination without leaving fingernail marks in the armrest. Today, we’ll learn why you freak out at 30,000 feet and do a 10-second test to see if you’re prone to panic. Plus, the skinny on Xanax and what to do next

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientific American presents Savvy Psychologist by Quick & Dirty Tips. Scientific American and Quick & Dirty Tips are both Macmillan companies.

Last week on the Savvy Psychologist show, we discussed tips and tricks to get you on a plane and to your destination without the aid of the airport bar or having a panic attack. Check out How to Overcome Your Fear of Flying (Part 1) for more.

This week, we'll tackle the reasons behind your flying fears, plus some more tips on how to manage them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In-Flight Panic
An in-flight panic attack can be triggered by thinking you’re in danger, fear of a panic attack itself, or even just out of the blue.  And if you’ve actually experienced a panic attack on a plane, memories of those excruciating minutes are often enough to keep you grounded, or at least heavily sedated on your next flight.  What you’re afraid of is no longer flying, but of panic.  Your fear really is of the fear itself.

How does it start?  Panic often flares from a spark in your own body—a racing heart, a tight throat, a feeling of lightheadedness.  If you’re leery of flying, you may be on the edge of your seat to begin with during a flight.  Then, a sensation such as popping ears due to increasing altitude, a stomach drop due to turbulence, or feeling smothered in the recycled air can all contribute to catastrophic thoughts of losing control, dying, or simply being trapped in a metal tube for hours with hundreds of strangers, a surefire way to jump-start a panic attack.

Some of us are more attuned to bodily sensations than others.  You probably know someone who can’t tell if she’s hungry or has no idea how he got that bruise.  On the flip side, you probably also know someone straight out of The Princess and the Pea.  This awareness of one’s own body (or lack thereof) is called interoceptive awareness.  Interoceptive awareness, unsurprisingly, is more sensitive in individuals prone to panic attacks. 

A classic and easy way of measuring your own interoceptive awareness is try to sense your own heartbeat.   To try this, sit straight up without letting your back touch your chair, put your hands in your lap, and breathe normally.  If you can’t detect it, don’t despair.  Either way is considered normal.  That said, a 2011 study found that individuals with a fear of flying have higher interoceptive awareness than those who fly without a second thought. 
 

>> Continue reading on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe