New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How to Watch a Chemical Reaction in Slow Motion

Infrared spectroscopy and computer simulations reveal the hidden world of solvent-solute interactions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The hydrogen bonds that hold together the molecular base pairs of our DNA form in intracellular fluid. Much of our planet's environmental chemistry occurs in oceans and other bodies of water. Most drugs are synthesized in solvents. Yet chemists generally study the bond-by-bond mechanics of chemical reactions only in the gas phase, where molecules are relatively sparse and easy to track. In a liquid there are more molecules and more collisions among them, so reactions are fast, messy and complicated. The process you want to observe will look like an undifferentiated blur—unless, that is, you can take snapshots of the reaction in a few trillionths of a second.

Andrew Orr-Ewing, a chemist at the University of Bristol in England, uses lasers to study chemical reactions. He knew that reactions in liquid catalyzed by heat create vibrations that can be observed in the infrared spectrum. In experiments conducted between 2012 and 2014, Orr-Ewing and then Bristol doctoral student Greg Dunning shot an ultrafast ultraviolet pulse at xenon difluoride molecules in a solvent called acetonitrile. The laser pulse acted like a scalpel, carving off highly reactive fluorine atoms, which in turn stole deuterium atoms from the solvent molecules, forming deuterium fluoride. The speed with which the telltale infrared vibrations appeared and then vanished after the first laser pulse—observed using a standard technique called infrared spectroscopy—revealed how quickly bonds formed between atoms and how quickly the reaction reached equilibrium.

The experiments were a proof of concept for observing the split-picosecond details of reactions in liquids. Most chemists, however, use computer simulations to observe and refine chemical reactions instead of expensive lasers and detectors. For them, Orr-Ewing's Bristol colleagues David Glowacki and Jeremy Harvey wrote simulation software that predicted the results of Orr-Ewing's spectroscopy experiments with an extraordinary level of accuracy. “We can use these simulations to peer more deeply into what's going on,” Orr-Ewing says, “because they tell us more precise information than we can get from the experiments.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Together the experiments and simulations provide the best insights so far into how a chemical reaction actually happens in a liquid. Developers are already starting to incorporate the team's methods into computer simulations for academic and industrial use, which could benefit scientists doing disease research, drug development and ecological studies.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Slow-Motion Cameras for Chemical Reactions” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 6 (), p. 39
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1215-39a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe