How to Watch a Chemical Reaction in Slow Motion

Infrared spectroscopy and computer simulations reveal the hidden world of solvent-solute interactions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The hydrogen bonds that hold together the molecular base pairs of our DNA form in intracellular fluid. Much of our planet's environmental chemistry occurs in oceans and other bodies of water. Most drugs are synthesized in solvents. Yet chemists generally study the bond-by-bond mechanics of chemical reactions only in the gas phase, where molecules are relatively sparse and easy to track. In a liquid there are more molecules and more collisions among them, so reactions are fast, messy and complicated. The process you want to observe will look like an undifferentiated blur—unless, that is, you can take snapshots of the reaction in a few trillionths of a second.

Andrew Orr-Ewing, a chemist at the University of Bristol in England, uses lasers to study chemical reactions. He knew that reactions in liquid catalyzed by heat create vibrations that can be observed in the infrared spectrum. In experiments conducted between 2012 and 2014, Orr-Ewing and then Bristol doctoral student Greg Dunning shot an ultrafast ultraviolet pulse at xenon difluoride molecules in a solvent called acetonitrile. The laser pulse acted like a scalpel, carving off highly reactive fluorine atoms, which in turn stole deuterium atoms from the solvent molecules, forming deuterium fluoride. The speed with which the telltale infrared vibrations appeared and then vanished after the first laser pulse—observed using a standard technique called infrared spectroscopy—revealed how quickly bonds formed between atoms and how quickly the reaction reached equilibrium.

The experiments were a proof of concept for observing the split-picosecond details of reactions in liquids. Most chemists, however, use computer simulations to observe and refine chemical reactions instead of expensive lasers and detectors. For them, Orr-Ewing's Bristol colleagues David Glowacki and Jeremy Harvey wrote simulation software that predicted the results of Orr-Ewing's spectroscopy experiments with an extraordinary level of accuracy. “We can use these simulations to peer more deeply into what's going on,” Orr-Ewing says, “because they tell us more precise information than we can get from the experiments.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Together the experiments and simulations provide the best insights so far into how a chemical reaction actually happens in a liquid. Developers are already starting to incorporate the team's methods into computer simulations for academic and industrial use, which could benefit scientists doing disease research, drug development and ecological studies.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Slow-Motion Cameras for Chemical Reactions” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 6 (), p. 39
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1215-39a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe