In Israel Kids Cross Streets in Virtual Reality for Safety Science

Children lack the hazard-perception skills of adults, but training could bolster their ability to stay safe on the street

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“Look both ways before you cross the street!” “Look left, right and left again!” These classic childhood safety lessons span generations and cultures. Yet traffic accidents remain one of the most common sources of injuries and fatalities for children around the world. In the European Union, children younger than 14 years account for a higher proportion of pedestrian mortalities than any other age group except the elderly; in the U.S., among children killed by cars, nearly a quarter were on foot. The numbers are particularly chilling in Israel, where kids account for 20 percent of pedestrian deaths.

Past studies have found that youngsters are less adept at identifying road hazards than adults, but Anat Meir, a lecturer in industrial engineering and management at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and the Holon Institute of Technology in Israel, wanted to pinpoint exactly which behaviors lead to accidents, with the goal of finding ways to correct them.

To do that without putting anyone in danger, she turned to virtual reality. In 2013 Meir and her colleagues simulated 18 prototypical streets in Israel and used an eye-tracking device to study how 46 adults and children (ranging in age from seven to 13) evaluated when it was safe to cross. Children aged seven to nine, they found, exhibited the least caution when crossing, typically deciding to step into the virtual road with little or no hesitation, even when their field of vision was restricted. “We had parents looking on who were like, 'Wow, I cannot believe my child just crossed there!'” Meir says. “It caused them to reassess their child's road-crossing abilities.” The older children did not perform much better, though for different reasons. They often lingered on the curb for an inordinate amount of time—an indication that they are less able to distinguish between safe and hazardous situations than adults—and in interviews did not express an understanding of how factors such as car speed and field of vision affect crossing safety.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Interventions do seem to improve crossing success. In Meir's most recent study, described in Accident Analysis & Prevention, two dozen seven- to nine-year-olds underwent 40 minutes of hazard-detection training. Afterward, Meir and her colleagues compared trainees' and control kids' performances in the virtual road-crossing task. The children who received safety instructions were significantly better at crossing than the control subjects—to the point that their crossing skills resembled those of adults.

Next, Meir and policy makers aim to figure out how to translate these findings into the real world. “These kind of results are important because you cannot build interventions without an understanding of the problem,” says Joseph Kearney, a professor of computer science and associate dean of research and infrastructure at the University of Iowa, who was not involved in the work. “Now it's up to people with their feet on the ground to determine how they can develop training programs for children and for parents about good road-crossing habits.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe