New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

In Defense of Big Data

A Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor makes the case that critics of big data are wrong—abundant information and our ability to process it really is leading to a revolution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Before he reimagined our planet as a giant information-storage device for the August 2015 issue, César A. Hidalgo, associate professor at the M.I.T. Media Lab, wrote for Scientific American about big data—what it can do and why its critics are wrong. Last April, in an essay published in SA’s Forum, Hidalgo argued that “it has become fashionable to bad-mouth big data,” but that “most of the recent criticism…has been weak and misguided. Naysayers have been attacking straw men, focusing on worst practices, post hoc failures and secondary sources.” In doing so, these critics “ignore areas where big data has made substantial progress, such as data-rich Web sites, information visualization and machine learning.” Read his entire argument here.

A few weeks before that he demonstrated a new generation of tools for understanding big data in “The Data-Visualization Revolution.” “We would argue that our ability to understand and visualize large sets of data is entering a similar stage of evolution as 17th-century astronomy,” he wrote. “As Galileo did centuries ago, we now have primitive versions of tools that have the potential to become powerful ones. These tools allow us to explore the fluid landscape of bits, instead of the rigidity of atoms, giving rise to a new medium that is helping us comprehend the complex while simultaneously providing a new means of artistic expression.” For the rest of his essay—and interactive examples of big-data “telescopes”—see the entire post below.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-data-visualization-revolution/

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe