In Defense of Big Data

A Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor makes the case that critics of big data are wrong—abundant information and our ability to process it really is leading to a revolution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Before he reimagined our planet as a giant information-storage device for the August 2015 issue, César A. Hidalgo, associate professor at the M.I.T. Media Lab, wrote for Scientific American about big data—what it can do and why its critics are wrong. Last April, in an essay published in SA’s Forum, Hidalgo argued that “it has become fashionable to bad-mouth big data,” but that “most of the recent criticism…has been weak and misguided. Naysayers have been attacking straw men, focusing on worst practices, post hoc failures and secondary sources.” In doing so, these critics “ignore areas where big data has made substantial progress, such as data-rich Web sites, information visualization and machine learning.” Read his entire argument here.

A few weeks before that he demonstrated a new generation of tools for understanding big data in “The Data-Visualization Revolution.” “We would argue that our ability to understand and visualize large sets of data is entering a similar stage of evolution as 17th-century astronomy,” he wrote. “As Galileo did centuries ago, we now have primitive versions of tools that have the potential to become powerful ones. These tools allow us to explore the fluid landscape of bits, instead of the rigidity of atoms, giving rise to a new medium that is helping us comprehend the complex while simultaneously providing a new means of artistic expression.” For the rest of his essay—and interactive examples of big-data “telescopes”—see the entire post below.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-data-visualization-revolution/

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe