Is Nutrition Research Broken? An Interview with Taylor Wallace

U.S. dietary recommendations lag decades behind the emerging science on diet and nutrition

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

My guest on today's podcast is Dr. Taylor Wallace. Taylor is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Nutrition and Food Studies at George Mason University and CEO at the Think Healthy Group, Inc. His research and work focus on how we can use diet as a tool to prevent chronic disease. In this interview, Taylor and I discuss the current state of nutrition research and policy and what we can do to improve it. 

Dr Wallace recently published an opinion piece in USA Today calling for the establishment of a National Institute of Nutrition. He argues that nutrition research is grossly underfunded by the federal government, which has a cascade of negative effects on the nation's health.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Here's an example. Every five years, a board of experts convenes to update the nation's Dietary Guidelines. Each time, they identify questions requiring further research. But there is no funding for this research. As a result, our dietary recommendations lag decades behind the emerging science on diet and nutrition. Dr. Wallace proposes establishing a National Institute of Nutrition as a way of prioritizing this important research and improving the nation's health. There’s also been a lot of criticism that the nutrition recommendations we do have are overly dependent on observational studies, correlations, and people’s notoriously imperfect ability to remember or estimate what and how much they ate over the last 24 hours or 6 months. Taylor shares his views on the role of epidemiological research and industry-funded research in shaping nutrition recommendations. We also explore what part agricultural interests (should) play in our nutrition policy.

Click the audio player to listen to our conversation around these big questions:

  • Can the USDA simultaneously promote agriculture and the nation's health?

  • Can industry-funded research be trusted?

  • How can we lessen the effects of bias on nutrition research?

  • What role does the food industry play in solving (or causing) our health challenges?

  • What is the future of nutrition research?

»Continue reading “Is Nutrition Research Broken? An interview with Dr. Taylor Wallace” on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe